Income security during periods of ill health: a scoping review of policies, practice and coverage in low-income and middle-income countries

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is a reminder that insufficient income security in periods of ill health leads to economic hardship for individuals and hampers disease control efforts as people struggle to stay home when sick or advised to observe quarantine. Evidence on income security during periods of ill health is growing but has not previously been reviewed as a full body of work concerning low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We performed a scoping review to map the range, features, coverage, protective effects and equity of policies that aim to provide income security for adults whose ill health prevents them from participating in gainful work. A total of 134 studies were included, providing data from 95% of LMICs. However, data across the majority of these countries were severely limited. Collectively the included studies demonstrate that coverage of contributory income-security schemes is low, especially for informal and low-income workers. Meanwhile, non-contributory schemes targeting low-income groups are often not explicitly designed to provide income support in periods of ill health, they can be difficult to access and rarely provide sufficient income support to cover the needs of eligible recipients. While identifying an urgent need for more research on illness-related income security in LMICs, this review concludes that scaling up and diversifying the range of income security interventions is crucial for improving coverage and equity. To achieve these outcomes, illness-related income protection must receive greater recognition in health policy and health financing circles, expanding our understanding of financial hardship beyond direct medical costs.

COVID-19: transformative actions for more equitable, resilient, sustainable societies and health systems in the Americas

“…BMJ Global Health remain over time, there is a growing consensus on the need to critically look at the future in terms of health, social and economic policy. [4][5][6] Fundamental changes are required in how we approach health and development objectives from the perspective of health and economic security, and on the basic principle of the guarantee of rights, protections and access to health, so that people and societies can be protected and survive in the face of multifaceted threats and risks-biological, natural or economic in nature.…”

Build back stronger universal health coverage systems after the COVID-19 pandemic: the need for better governance and linkage with universal social protection

“…A recent review article showed that, in most low and middle income countries, the effective coverage of the policies in place for income security is very low and existing schemes often exclude those who have the greatest need. 27 …”

Assessing national performance in response to COVID-19

“…Many jobs have been, and will be, lost and companies and businesses may be unable to function efficiently due to sickness, isolation, quarantine, and various non-pharmaceutical community interventions including business closure, working from home, and physical distancing. 11 , 12 Provision of socioeconomic support is needed to remove possible disincentives and facilitate individual and public compliance with COVID-19 response measures. Furthermore, community confidence and compliance are more likely if there is reassurance that supply chains of food and medicines are resilient and that access is maintained for all.…”