2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.62.14252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incoherent magnetization reversal in 30-nm Ni particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitting result yields a T B value of $400 K, which indicates an energy barrier for magnetic switching as 25 k B T B or $0.86 eV, being almost one order of magnitude of that found for Ni nanoparticles of similar or lager size deposited on a Si surface. 30 This high blocking temperature is also supported by the observation of magnetic hysteresis loops even at room temperature (inset in Fig. 6).…”
Section: Implications On Magnetic Anisotropy and Particle Interactsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fitting result yields a T B value of $400 K, which indicates an energy barrier for magnetic switching as 25 k B T B or $0.86 eV, being almost one order of magnitude of that found for Ni nanoparticles of similar or lager size deposited on a Si surface. 30 This high blocking temperature is also supported by the observation of magnetic hysteresis loops even at room temperature (inset in Fig. 6).…”
Section: Implications On Magnetic Anisotropy and Particle Interactsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Another type of inter-particle interactions could be the exchange interaction, but the Ni nanoparticles (filled nanocavities) are separated by $50 nm, well exceeding the magnetic exchange length ($20 nm) in Ni. 30 Whether an indirect exchange process assisted by carriers in Si occurs in this system would be an interesting issue for investigations in the future.…”
Section: Implications On Magnetic Anisotropy and Particle Interactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2͑b͒ and 2͑c͒ cannot be explained through coherent magnetization rotation. Indeed, computer simulations by Ross et al 15 and Nielsch et al 16 show that the magnetization process in the nanostructures is evidently different from the abrupt coherent magnetization reversal predicted by SW model. For the nanostructures with small aspect ratio, the magnetization occurs through incoherent magnetization reversal, 15 whereas in nanowires domain walls nucleate at the ends of the wires and propagate along the wires.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, computer simulations by Ross et al 15 and Nielsch et al 16 show that the magnetization process in the nanostructures is evidently different from the abrupt coherent magnetization reversal predicted by SW model. For the nanostructures with small aspect ratio, the magnetization occurs through incoherent magnetization reversal, 15 whereas in nanowires domain walls nucleate at the ends of the wires and propagate along the wires. 16 A Mi-Ha AAM with large interpore distance of 250 nm was synthesized in order to check the effect of magnetostatic interactions among the nanowires, compared with regular membranes with about 100 nm interpore separations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arrays of nanoparticles with large aspect ratios can be produced by various methods, [1][2][3] but electron beam nanolithography seems to be the most flexible of all in defining the lateral structures. Arbitrary shapes with dimensions in the range from 30 nm to 100 m can be patterned using this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%