1996
DOI: 10.1364/ol.21.001538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incoherent collisions between two-dimensional bright steady-state photorefractive spatial screening solitons

Abstract: We report the observation of incoherent collisions between two-dimensional bright photorefractive screening solitons. The solitons remain intact and do not exchange energy whenever the collision angle exceeds thecritical angle for guidance in the waveguide that each soliton induces, which is, in turn, fully controlled by the soliton parameters. When the collision angle is much smaller than the critical angle the solitons fuse to form a single beam.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(18 reference statements)
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can take advantage of the finite response time and observe collisions of solitons that are mutually incoherent, i.e., their relative phase (therefore their interference) varies randomly in time much faster than the medium can respond, hence the two-beam-coupling interaction is totally eliminated (now ᭞I ᭞I 1 1 ᭞I 2 , leading to self-bending 16 of both solitons). Incoherent collisions between photorefractive solitons 17 were found to be subject to the optical guiding properties of the waveguides induced by each of the solitons, which in turn are controlled by the soliton existence curve. 18 Here we study coherent collisions between photorefractive solitons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can take advantage of the finite response time and observe collisions of solitons that are mutually incoherent, i.e., their relative phase (therefore their interference) varies randomly in time much faster than the medium can respond, hence the two-beam-coupling interaction is totally eliminated (now ᭞I ᭞I 1 1 ᭞I 2 , leading to self-bending 16 of both solitons). Incoherent collisions between photorefractive solitons 17 were found to be subject to the optical guiding properties of the waveguides induced by each of the solitons, which in turn are controlled by the soliton existence curve. 18 Here we study coherent collisions between photorefractive solitons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most of the voltage drop occurs in the regions outside the solitons, and since each soliton is much narrower than l, we can generate solitons a and b simultaneously, using the same voltage as for a single soliton ( of the same width as a and b). 17 We image the beams at the output face of the crystal onto a CCD camera with 61-mm resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, two self focused beams can interact [16][17][18][19][20], allowing to control the propagation direction of one beam with another beam, thus giving the basic mechanism for an all optical router.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, spatial optical solitons exhibit richness of characteristics not found for localized waves in other nonlinear media [5]. Indeed, much theoretical and experimental investigations have been performed for optical spatial solitons: elastic interaction of Kerr solitons [7,8,9,10], almost elastic and inelastic collisions of solitons in saturable media including fusion, fission, annihilation, and spiraling occurances [11] (see also [5]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%