2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusion of Regional Body Composition Parameters Improves Bone Mineral Density Cross-Calibration Between GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Densitometers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, all scanners were matched to Lunar DPX‐IQ values with linear functions and mathematical models, as presented in previous studies. ( 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ) However, a small inaccuracy may be present between the devices, although any potential error may be considered to be systematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, all scanners were matched to Lunar DPX‐IQ values with linear functions and mathematical models, as presented in previous studies. ( 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ) However, a small inaccuracy may be present between the devices, although any potential error may be considered to be systematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calculations have been described. ( 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ) All values were converted to match DPX‐IQ in the present analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Rotterdam the Lunar Prodigy device (GE Corporate, Madison, WI, USA) was used to assess body composition. Differences between the iDXA and the Prodigy device were negligible, hence cross-calibration was not necessary[ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent reports have identified the precision error of total body and regional body composition parameters from a total body DXA scan in the AB population. 12, 13 In a study by Lohman et al 14 , the authors documented the “on and off” the table reproducibility of total body DXA in measuring LM, FM, BMC. Utilizing Pearson correlation coefficients to quantify reliability, the authors found excellent correlations between repeat scans for total body BMC (r = 0.99), LM (r = 0.99), and FM (r = 1.00), and bone mineral density (BMD) (r = 0.98), with regional reliability measurements that were considerably less precise than the total body measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%