2018
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Including qualitative research in Randomized Controlled Trials: Opportunities for nursing researchers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these quantitative studies have their limitations: a reduction in the interaction between children and older people following a break period in the intervention – suggesting that children required more time to get back into the routine of the programme was evident (Belgrave, ); perceiving older people as a homogenous population within sampling without distinguishing any demographic or other social differences (Liu et al, ); a failure to account for why some older people were non‐responsive within the interventions (Newman & Ward, ); high dropout rates between the intervention and follow‐up (Yasunaga et al, ); and a failure to fully account for children's previous experience with older people and how this may influence their perceptions (Kamei et al, ). Most of these limitations could have been addressed by the inclusion of a qualitative element in the design to capture the lived experience of the participants involved in the study (Sasso et al, ). It is acknowledged that qualitative research adds depth and detail to quantitative investigations in health care – particularly when the patient experience is so central to the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these quantitative studies have their limitations: a reduction in the interaction between children and older people following a break period in the intervention – suggesting that children required more time to get back into the routine of the programme was evident (Belgrave, ); perceiving older people as a homogenous population within sampling without distinguishing any demographic or other social differences (Liu et al, ); a failure to account for why some older people were non‐responsive within the interventions (Newman & Ward, ); high dropout rates between the intervention and follow‐up (Yasunaga et al, ); and a failure to fully account for children's previous experience with older people and how this may influence their perceptions (Kamei et al, ). Most of these limitations could have been addressed by the inclusion of a qualitative element in the design to capture the lived experience of the participants involved in the study (Sasso et al, ). It is acknowledged that qualitative research adds depth and detail to quantitative investigations in health care – particularly when the patient experience is so central to the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As those nurses who missed care are also likely to be more dissatisfied (Kalisch & Xie, 2014), perhaps it is the dissatisfaction that prompts negative responses about care activities, thus perhaps a perspective rather than a reflection of reality. Our study found that qualitative data, albeit subjective, provided a unique perspective not possible through large-scale studies (Sasso, Hayter, et al, 2019). There is merit, therefore, in developing mixed-method research in this field, and for a greater understanding of missed care in context, rather than aiming to reach a global or European perspective, which may not be possible given the diversity and uniqueness of health care settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Importantly, the patients reported improvement in patient‐centred care as measured by surveys comprising validated measures. Qualitative approaches are able to capture the lived experiences of participants, adding to the quantitative data obtained via surveys (Sasso et al, 2019). A recent framework for integrating qualitative methods into RCTs may assist in this regard (Davis et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%