2015
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201404-144oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidental Findings on Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients Evaluated for Pulmonary Embolism

Abstract: CT angiography is superior to chest radiography at providing a diagnosis in patients investigated for PE, even when no PE is present. However, in patients at low risk for PE, the clinical benefit of the additional diagnoses is questionable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
2
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
36
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an additional 5% of CT patients receive months of anticoagulation and carry the medical diagnosis of PE for the rest of their lives, increasing insurance costs and probably individual patient anxiety. Incidental findings such as pulmonary nodules or adrenal masses are common with advanced imaging, particularly in older individuals . These “incidentalomas” can lead to significant additional downstream testing .…”
Section: Relevance Of “Preventing Overdiagnosis” For Emergency Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an additional 5% of CT patients receive months of anticoagulation and carry the medical diagnosis of PE for the rest of their lives, increasing insurance costs and probably individual patient anxiety. Incidental findings such as pulmonary nodules or adrenal masses are common with advanced imaging, particularly in older individuals . These “incidentalomas” can lead to significant additional downstream testing .…”
Section: Relevance Of “Preventing Overdiagnosis” For Emergency Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 20 ) In addition, the role played by chest CTA in the absence of PTE in making alternative diagnoses that were missed by simple tests, such as chest X-ray, has not been fully investigated. ( 18 - 20 )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are risks of false‐positive findings when the interpreting physician, who can be the radiologist or the ED physician, misreads an imaging test . Incidental findings are particularly concerning, given the downstream testing that may be unnecessary and can occur as a result . Intravenous contrast carries a risk of acute kidney injury and of allergic reactions .…”
Section: Current State Of Diagnostic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%