Incidental findings of implant complications on postimplantation CBCTs: A cross‐sectional study—Methodological issues

Positioning errors of dental implants and their associations with adjacent structures and anatomical variations: A CBCT-based study

“…25,26 The smaller the voxel size, for example, the better the image quality and the lower the occurrence of the partial volume effect, but also the higher the radiation dose required. 12,24,25 The parameters used in this study are consistent with those commonly used for full arch acquisitions. Moreover, even with inherent drawbacks such as the production of artifacts by implants, which can mask the visualization of neurovascular bundles and peri-implant bone defects, 3 CBCT has shown clinically acceptable performance for this purpose.…”

“…2 This may mask the actual prevalence of errors and cause misinterpretation of possible location-related complications. 12 In addition, possible differences in sample size, study population, and analysis methods should be considered. In the study conducted by Gaêta-Araujo et al, 5 for example, the authors did not present the general prevalence of errors, but instead reported independent prevalence rates for perforations into anatomical structures (33.3%) and inadequate distance between the implant and the adjacent tooth/implant (18.2%).…”

Navigating the future of guided dental implantology: A scoping review

“…The demand for high accuracy in implant site preparation and placement arises for several important reasons. First, to avoid critical anatomical landmarks, such as the maxillary sinus and the inferior alveolar canal 58 . Secondly, achieving the correct 3D position of the implant is essential to ensure the long‐term success of the dental implants 55 …”

“…First, to avoid critical anatomical landmarks, such as the maxillary sinus and the inferior alveolar canal. 58 Secondly, achieving the correct 3D position of the implant is essential to ensure the long-term success of the dental implants. 55 Implant placement in the cortical bone of the posterior mandible requires a substantial amount of input force.…”

The accuracy of a novel image‐guided hybrid robotic system for dental implant placement: An in vitro study

“…In some taskautonomy robots, surgeons discretely control the robot, monitor and intervene as needed, and it performs the task automatically. 3,8,11,12 In dental implant surgery, because there are some vital anatomical structures such as maxilla sinus and mandible canal close to planned implant sites 13 and a correct three-dimensional position of implant is essential for long-term stability of surrounded tissues, ideal prosthetic outcome and optimal occlusal contacts, 10 the accuracy requirement of implant site preparation and implant placement is very high. What's more, the placement of implant in cortical bone in posterior mandible needs high input force.…”