2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence rates of hospital-acquired urinary tract and bloodstream infections generated by automated compilation of electronically available healthcare data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We reported an overall HABSI rate of 5.59 HABSI cases per 10,000 patient days, similar to 6.0 per 10,000 patient days reported by the only recent high-coverage (24 hospitals), multicenter study in Queensland, Australia during a period overlapping ours 1 . A smaller study in Denmark reported a rate of 6.4 per 10,000 patient days and another in the United States reported a range between 11.2 and 6.7 per 10,000 patient days 2 3 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We reported an overall HABSI rate of 5.59 HABSI cases per 10,000 patient days, similar to 6.0 per 10,000 patient days reported by the only recent high-coverage (24 hospitals), multicenter study in Queensland, Australia during a period overlapping ours 1 . A smaller study in Denmark reported a rate of 6.4 per 10,000 patient days and another in the United States reported a range between 11.2 and 6.7 per 10,000 patient days 2 3 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Some exhibited decreases, 3,20 others increases, 21 and some no consistent trend. 2,22,23 It is difficult to compare our reported temporal trends because (1) time periods did not overlap, 20,22,23 (2) studied hospitals had characteristics different to ours, 2,3 or (3) denominators used were population based, not hospital based. 21,22 The BACTOT data collection procedure facilitated our analysis of HABSI cases and rates by infection source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 17 Another research demonstrated that the monthly incidence rates varied between 4.14 and 6.61 per 1000 bed-days for UTI and between 0.09 and 1.25 per 1000 bed-days for BSI. 18 This indicated the higher incidence of nosocomial infection in our survey compared to other studies. This difference is may be because of this fact that the participants in our survey were trauma patients who are more prone to infection due to fractures or open wounds than non-traumatic ones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…18 Other electronic surveillance systems are also using a 48-hour cutoff. 6,9,[22][23][24] The number of (positive) blood cultures was shown to decrease soon after admission (day 1) and to increase from day 4 onward. 12 This finding may also suggest that 48 hours is a useful cutoff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%