Incidence, prevalence, and hybrid approaches to calculating disability-adjusted life years

Abstract

When disability-adjusted life years are used to measure the burden of disease on a population in a time interval, they can be calculated in several different ways: from an incidence, pure prevalence, or hybrid perspective. I show that these calculation methods are not equivalent and discuss some of the formal difficulties each method faces. I show that if we don’t discount the value of future health, there is a sense in which the choice of calculation method is a mere question of accounting. Such questions can be important, but they don’t raise deep theoretical concerns. If we do discount, however, choice of calculation method can change the relative burden attributed to different conditions over time. I conclude by recommending that studies involving disability-adjusted life years be explicit in noting what calculation method is being employed and in explaining why that calculation method has been chosen.

Custos econômicos e impacto da dengue na Província de Cavite, Filipinas

“…Dengue fever, the mild form, is more common in adults while dengue hemorrhagic fever, the more severe form, is observed more frequently in children below 15 years of age [40,41,53]. Thus,…”

“…Discounting therefore allows for future health to be expressed in terms of present value [41]. Exhaustive discussions on the merits of different approaches commonly used in calculating DALYs has been done elsewhere [36,40]. Our perspective in this paper is to use DALYs as a conservative measurement tool to understand local BOD for health interventions; and to determine whether our DALYs conform to GBD trends -i.e., BOD shifting away from premature death prevalent in the 1990s to YLD.…”

“…A recent critic on disability weights argues that it does not conform to the concepts and measures of disability as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [38]. Despite the possibility of differing DALYs estimates due to methods used, DALYs has remained a useful tool in health interventions [39,40]. Our methodology for calculating DALYs used both elements of the revised DALYs and the older GDB studies.…”

Global and Regional Trends of Multiple Sclerosis Disability-Adjusted Life Years Rates: A 25-Year Assessment

“…This can be attributed to more enhanced diagnostic devices in the high-income countries; meanwhile, patients' survival improvement in these countries leads to the rise of disease prevalence. Since DALY is calculated directly using the incidence or prevalence rates, it could be concluded that this index is positively correlated with income level [31,32].…”

Burden Calculator: a simple and open analytical tool for estimating the population burden of injuries

“…Our model estimates incidence-DALYs, that is, it estimates the stream of future health loss connected with events that occur in a particular period, which is the approach that has been previously used by GBD 10. It should be noted, however, that GBD-2010 and subsequent revisions use a hybrid approach that combines incidence-YLLs and prevalence-YLDs.…”