2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 over four epidemic waves in a low-resource community in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: A prospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 41 Moreover, a prospective cohort study conducted in the same neighbourhood as our study estimated the incidence of COVID-19 during four waves (from May 2020 to Nov 2021) and found that the incidence was much higher than previously reported by similar studies in the US and that the incidence was the highest in the first wave (May through November 2020). 42 These results suggest that the burden of COVID-19 is highly unequal, impacting to a much higher degree vulnerable and marginalized populations. We hypothesize that the reasons for the disparities in COVID-19 burden stem from precarious living conditions (densely populated favelas and large household sizes), poverty (limited access to clean water and cleaning supplies), employment and income insecurity (people working in low-paid and informal jobs who are at risk of losing their income partially or completely), and the lack of economic support from the government, thus hindering the adoption of social distancing measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 41 Moreover, a prospective cohort study conducted in the same neighbourhood as our study estimated the incidence of COVID-19 during four waves (from May 2020 to Nov 2021) and found that the incidence was much higher than previously reported by similar studies in the US and that the incidence was the highest in the first wave (May through November 2020). 42 These results suggest that the burden of COVID-19 is highly unequal, impacting to a much higher degree vulnerable and marginalized populations. We hypothesize that the reasons for the disparities in COVID-19 burden stem from precarious living conditions (densely populated favelas and large household sizes), poverty (limited access to clean water and cleaning supplies), employment and income insecurity (people working in low-paid and informal jobs who are at risk of losing their income partially or completely), and the lack of economic support from the government, thus hindering the adoption of social distancing measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another strength of our study was the use of two automated commercially available assays to detect anti-S and anti-N SARS-COV-2 IgG antibodies. Finally, it is worth mentioning that although we have not performed internal validation tests of the performance of the anti-S IgG assay used in our analysis, several studies 42 , 69 , 75 , 76 used this assay to estimate seroprevalence and a large study with over 17,000 well-characterized blood samples (Canadian blood donors study) has estimated Abbott anti-S IgG sensitivity to be 95·96% (95% CI, 93·27 to 97·63%) and the specificity as 99·35% (95% CI, 99·21 to 99·46%). 70 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epidemiological scenario in the community has evolved during the study. 6 In March 2020, social distancing policies including quarantine and school closure were implemented. From April 2020 to October 2021, emergency financial assistance was made available to low-income households.…”
Section: Cohort Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, important VOCs, such as the Gamma variant [ 2 ], emerged in Brazil. The application of mass vaccinations led to a diminution in the Delta epidemic wave compared to other countries but was ineffective towards the Omicron VOC [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%