1979
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(79)90009-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of new pulmonary perfusion defects after routine cardiac catheterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cooperative study on cardiac catheterization [6] noted only 11 instances of pulmonary embolism and infarction in a total of 12,367 right heart and transeptal left heart catheterizations performed between 1963 and 1965. Primm et al [7] found a 12% incidence of new perfusion lung defects after right and left heart catheterizations in 57 adult patients. None of the patients were symptomatic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cooperative study on cardiac catheterization [6] noted only 11 instances of pulmonary embolism and infarction in a total of 12,367 right heart and transeptal left heart catheterizations performed between 1963 and 1965. Primm et al [7] found a 12% incidence of new perfusion lung defects after right and left heart catheterizations in 57 adult patients. None of the patients were symptomatic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A final group of high risk patients was studied by Primm et al [19] who performed VQ scans on 57 patients following cardiac catheterization and found PE in seven (12 %). All of these patients were asymptomatic.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Pulmonary Emboli In High Risk Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in those two reports there is no mention of how the diagnosis of pulmonary embolus was confirmed. Primm et a1 [9] noted an incidence of 16% of pulmonary emboli after the femoral approach and 8% after the brachial approach. This could be explained by the fact that in the latter study the patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: one in which right heart catheterization was performed using an antecubital venous cutdown, and another in which the percutaneous femoral vein approach was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%