1984
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810100206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of new focal pulmonary emboli after routine cardiac catheterization comparing the brachial to the femoral approach

Abstract: The incidence of pulmonary perfusion defects after routine cardiac catheterization was assessed in 56 patients by comparing ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scans obtained before and 1 day after catheterization. Patients were prospectively randomized in two groups, one in which the brachial approach was performed using an antecubital cutdown procedure, and one in which the percutaneous femoral approach was used. None of the patients with the brachial approach had any ventilation-perfusion mismatch on the V/Q s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the patients were symptomatic. In a similar study, Gowda et al [8] found an 8.3% incidence of new defects on perfusion lung scans after routine right and left heart catheterization in 50 adult patients using the femoral approach. None of the patients who had their catheterization via the brachial approach had any new defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…None of the patients were symptomatic. In a similar study, Gowda et al [8] found an 8.3% incidence of new defects on perfusion lung scans after routine right and left heart catheterization in 50 adult patients using the femoral approach. None of the patients who had their catheterization via the brachial approach had any new defects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The patient was discharged well the next day. [1] first described the technique of coronary pacing during PTCA to avoid additional venous puncture and the associated complications of transvenous pacing wires [2][3][4][5][6]. The value of the technique was further demonstrated prospectively in a group of 300 patients undergoing PTCA by de la Serna et al [7]: 7 patients (2%) required pacing for bradycardias but not for tachycardias.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%