1991
DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.1991.267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Major Infection in Sickle Cell Pediatric Patients at Qatif Central Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Infection rates showed some variation across KSA regions. In the southern area, the reported infection rate among SCA patients was 21.2%, and in the eastern region of KSA it was 8.6% 11. The difference in the incidence of infection among current study and previous KSA studies may be attributable to the presence of two different genetic types of SCA in the country 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Infection rates showed some variation across KSA regions. In the southern area, the reported infection rate among SCA patients was 21.2%, and in the eastern region of KSA it was 8.6% 11. The difference in the incidence of infection among current study and previous KSA studies may be attributable to the presence of two different genetic types of SCA in the country 12…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Opawoye et al reported a 21.2% infection in their study 9 in the Southern part of Saudi Arabia, and Abu Srair et al reported an 8.6% infection rate from the Eastern part of Saudi Arabia. 10 The difference in the incidence of infection between the two studies may be due to the presence of two different types of SCD in the country. 11 Urinary tract infection has been reported to be common in SCD patients, 12 as was observed in our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Mouzan M, et al [18] reported that painful crises of bones and joints were the most common initial symptoms. Opawoye et al stated a 21.2% infection [26] in the Southern part of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), and Abu Srair et al found an 8.6% infection rate from the Eastern part of Saudi Arabia [27]. The difference in the incidence of infection between the two studies might be caused by the presence of two different types of SCD in the country [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%