1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9071(199704)51:4<290::aid-jmv6>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of human calicivirus and rotavirus infection in patients with gastroenteritis in South Africa

Abstract: Human caliciviruses (HuCVs) are reportedly responsible for 2.5-4% of nonbacterial sporadic gastroenteritis. The incidence of HuCV infection in South Africa is unknown. Stool specimens from 1,296 South African patients with sporadic gastroenteritis were screened for the presence of HuCVs using electron microscopy, recombinant enzyme immunoassays for Norwalk (NV) and Mexican (MX) viruses, and the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). RT-PCR products were sequenced to ascertain which HuCV geno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
21
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with recent studies that describe RV as the most prevalent and NoV as the second most important viral agent causing gastroenteritis in children (RV 16.6-71.4%; NoV 12-17.3%). [31][32][33][34][35] The NoV and SaV prevalence determined in the current study is higher than previously estimated in the same region, 17 which could be attributed to the more sensitive realtime RT-PCR detection method applied. NoVs were detected only in children up to 2 years old (median age 8 months), which is in agreement with studies in Brazil and Nicaragua where more frequent NoV infections in children ≤2 years old were reported.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are consistent with recent studies that describe RV as the most prevalent and NoV as the second most important viral agent causing gastroenteritis in children (RV 16.6-71.4%; NoV 12-17.3%). [31][32][33][34][35] The NoV and SaV prevalence determined in the current study is higher than previously estimated in the same region, 17 which could be attributed to the more sensitive realtime RT-PCR detection method applied. NoVs were detected only in children up to 2 years old (median age 8 months), which is in agreement with studies in Brazil and Nicaragua where more frequent NoV infections in children ≤2 years old were reported.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…16 In 1997, the prevalence of HuCV infection in SA was estimated to be 3.3%, with NoVs representing 89% and sapoviruses (SaVs) 11%. 17 NoV GI and GII viruses were identified, but the GII strains (Mexicolike) predominated. A seroepidemiological study in the Pretoria area of SA indicated that 57% of children were exposed to NoV by 1-2 years of age and that 62% of the population was seropositive by the age of 40.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have reported similar results (Wolfaardt et al 1997, Bon et al1999, Bereciartu et al 2002.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Five different SaV genotypes were identified in HIV-seropositive children in Kenya [18]. In South Africa (SA), SaVs were first reported in 1997 in 0.4% of patients with sporadic gastroenteritis [19]. In 2008, SaVs were reported in 4% (10/245) of specimens from children hospitalised with gastroenteritis in the Pretoria region of Gauteng (GP), SA, but the strains were not further characterised [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%