2013
DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0b013e3182652213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Estonia

Abstract: Our estimates for cervical dysplasia disease frequency and age distribution are in line with those from other developed countries. Administrative health care resources (such as health insurance fund data) are a valuable source for health research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given our findings, there is a clear need to improve CC screening attendance among women in Estonia. We did not assess the performance of the Pap test in our study, but there are indirect indications of significant under-detection/diagnosis of CIN2+ in Estonia [25]. However, we support the idea of seeking and testing new innovative interventions to improve programme uptake through interventions such as self-sampling and electronic reminders [26], as well as changing CC test screening to HPV DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Given our findings, there is a clear need to improve CC screening attendance among women in Estonia. We did not assess the performance of the Pap test in our study, but there are indirect indications of significant under-detection/diagnosis of CIN2+ in Estonia [25]. However, we support the idea of seeking and testing new innovative interventions to improve programme uptake through interventions such as self-sampling and electronic reminders [26], as well as changing CC test screening to HPV DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We did not assess the performance of Pap test in our study, but there are indirect indications of signi cant under-detection/diagnosis of CIN2+ in Estonia. [30] However, we support the idea of seeking and testing new innovative interventions to improve program uptake through interventions like self-sampling and electronical [30] reminders as well as changing CC test for screening to HPV DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In this period, the total number of L-SIL and H-SIL (Pap III) findings amounted to 395 (6.20%) compared to other cytological findings 5894 (92.44%). Uusküla A. et al (14), in their study, “Incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Estonia” stated that the incidence of CIN on 1,000 women is in the range from 0.68 to 2.83 for CIN I, from 0.63 to 1.24 for CIN II and from 0.13 to 0.53 for CIN III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%