2002
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2002.806991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence angle dependence of the statistical properties of C-band HH-polarization backscattering signatures of the Baltic Sea ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
82
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
82
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the surface type is not known a priori we have to choose which angular correction to apply and the preference is given to the more reliable sea ice angular correction. However, the total compensation is impossible as the backscatter dependence on the incidence angle varies for dif- ferent ice types (Mäkynen et al, 2002) and water areas in the scene. The radiometric corrections during calibration process are just a first-order approximation; nevertheless, the advantages of performing the angular correction are greater than the disadvantages (Moen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Significance Of Incidence Angle Variations and Thermal Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the surface type is not known a priori we have to choose which angular correction to apply and the preference is given to the more reliable sea ice angular correction. However, the total compensation is impossible as the backscatter dependence on the incidence angle varies for dif- ferent ice types (Mäkynen et al, 2002) and water areas in the scene. The radiometric corrections during calibration process are just a first-order approximation; nevertheless, the advantages of performing the angular correction are greater than the disadvantages (Moen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Significance Of Incidence Angle Variations and Thermal Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced approaches are based on histogram or frequency matching [2], while many empirical approaches rely on fitting a first or second order polynomial to incidence angle and backscatter values [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Previous studies [7,9] have pointed out that the relationship between incidence angle and backscatter can be considered as linear for a limited incidence angle range. Mäkynen et al [9] found that the incidence angle range from 19 • to 46 • , which approximately corresponds to the incidence angle range covered by Sentinel-1, is usually well described by a linear model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some other purposes, such as ice type classification, we also apply an incidence angle correction (Makynen et al, 2002), which is based on an empirical linear relationship between mean sea ice backscattering and incidence angle value. This correction is, however, not necessary for the ice drift estimation.…”
Section: Sar Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%