2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10040551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified Normalization of C-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar Data for Terrestrial Applications in High Latitude Environments

Abstract: Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) applications often require normalization to a common incidence angle. Angular signatures of radar backscatter depend on surface roughness and vegetation cover, and thus differ, from location to location. Comprehensive reference datasets are therefore required in heterogeneous landscapes. Multiple acquisitions from overlapping orbits with sufficient incidence angle range are processed in order to obtain parameters of the location specific normalization function. We propose a simpl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, Landsat with 30 m spatial resolution has been the main data source. Further relevant information can be also derived from C-band SAR data, specifically data acquired under frozen conditions [42][43][44]. Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 have been therefore combined.…”
Section: Land Cover From Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So far, Landsat with 30 m spatial resolution has been the main data source. Further relevant information can be also derived from C-band SAR data, specifically data acquired under frozen conditions [42][43][44]. Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 have been therefore combined.…”
Section: Land Cover From Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ land-cover information was then applied to assign class names and define ROIs for the final maximum likelihood classification. This is based on a dedicated vegetation survey at VD (for details see [44]), the Yamal database [24], and a survey in the Northern Ural for land-cover types in the tundra taiga transition zone as a full transect was targeted. The classification accuracy ranges between 70 and 83.3% for the VD site with largest values for the dominant land-cover type 'dry to moist prostrate to erect dwarf shrub tundra' [28].…”
Section: Land Cover From Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As temporal variations of backscatter can occur with changes in liquid water content, only winter data (December and/or January; frozen soil conditions) are used for cross-Arctic consistency and comparability (see Table 1). The use of such data also allows for simplified normalization with respect to the incidence angle influence on backscatter intensity when deriving the backscatter coefficient σ 0 , which is commonly used [53]. Acquisitions from July to early August (snow-free season) have been considered (see, e.g., the selected scenes of the validation granules in Table 2).…”
Section: Satellite Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to classify the images, a functional relationship between σ 0 and the incidence angle θ was calculated following a similar approach as suggested by Bartsch et al (2017) but applying a linear function as only a limited range is used (see also Widhalm et al, 2018;Bartsch et al, 2020; with a being the slope and b the intercept).…”
Section: Threshold Determination and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%