2018
DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence and Time of Onset of Osseous Pseudoprogression in Patients With Metastatic Spine Disease From Renal Cell or Prostate Carcinoma After Treatment With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Abstract: There was a higher incidence of PP in lytic compared to sclerotic primary tumor type. PP in spinal metastatic sites may have variable presentations depending on the primary cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than true progression which demonstrates consistent growth over time, the radiographical appearance of pseudoprogression subsequently subsides on serial imaging. The incidence of pseudoprogression has been reported in the range of 14–37% and risk factors include lytic tumors, earlier volume enlargement, greater GTV to reference non-irradiated vertebral body T2 intensity ratio, and growth confined to 80% of the prescription isodose line (6769).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than true progression which demonstrates consistent growth over time, the radiographical appearance of pseudoprogression subsequently subsides on serial imaging. The incidence of pseudoprogression has been reported in the range of 14–37% and risk factors include lytic tumors, earlier volume enlargement, greater GTV to reference non-irradiated vertebral body T2 intensity ratio, and growth confined to 80% of the prescription isodose line (6769).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where reported, LC was usually defined as an absence of tumor volume change consistent with radiologic progression. As the radiotherapy community is gaining more experience with SBRT, it becomes clear that pseudoprogression and tissue necrosis are important factors to consider after SBRT (58, 87). Only four studies accounted for pseudoprogression by obtaining confirmatory scans before the lesion was classified as progressing, potentially resulting in an underestimation of LC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the use of the 80% isodose line to describe the high dose region was extrapolated from the CNS setting and has not been validated for the spine. Maralani et al retrospectively reviewed 43 spinal segments treated with SABR 31 . Sixteen (16) arose from prostate cancer (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%