Incest and substance abuse: Implications for treatment professionals

Janikowski, Timothy P.; Glover, Noreen M.

doi:10.1016/0740-5472(94)90074-4

Cited by 38 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A trauma framework, however, might have significant conceptual, empirical, and translational utility for consideration for future research in this important area of study. Over the years, a number of studies have demonstrated a biopsychosocial interaction between traumatic stress and substance use, describing the relationship between the two conditions as reciprocal and complex (Grella, Stein, & Greenwell, 2005;Janikowski & Glover, 1994;Sprang et al, 2008). Studies have documented trauma exposure ranging from 30% to 90% in substance-using, treatment-seeking samples (Moncrieff, Drummond, Candy, Checinski, & Farmer, 1996;Najavits, Weiss, Shaw, & Muenz, 1998;Rice et al, 2001).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Caregiver Substance Use and Child Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Staton‐Tindall

Sprang

Clark

et al. 2013

Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Caregiver Substance Use and Child Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Staton‐Tindall

Sprang

Clark

et al. 2013

Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Janikowski & Glover have argued that people recovering from a drug abuse or dependence disorder who do not receive therapy for their experiences of childhood abuse are highly likely to relapse because the shame, guilt and anger, that might have been being alleviated by the drug use, will continue to exist [88].…”

Section: Traumatic Life Eventsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Causes and correlates of adolescent drug abuse and implications for treatment

Spooner

1999

Drug and Alcohol Review

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On the basis of the literature, the following risk factors for drug abuse by adolescents were identified: biological predisposition to drug abuse; personality traits that reflect a lack of social bonding; a history of low quality and consistency of family management, family communication, family relationships and parental role‐modelling, a history of being abused or neglected; low socio‐economic status; emotional or psychiatric problems; significant stressors and/or inadequate coping skills and social supports; inadequate social skills; history of associating with drug‐using peers, rejection by prosocial peers due to poor social skills; a history of low commitment to education, failure at school; a history of anti‐social behaviour and delinquency and early initiation to drug use. Models for conceptualizing the aetiology of drug abuse are discussed, namely Jessor's problem behaviour syndrome and Rhodes & Jason's Social Stress Model. It is clear that the path to drug abuse is complex, so simple solutions to the problem are unlikely to be effective. [Spooner C. Causes and correlates of adolescent drug abuse and implications for treatment. Drug Alcohol Rev 1999;18:453–475]

show abstract

“…Strategies that survivors develop for self-protection, combined with the posttraumatic stress symptoms of hyperarousal or avoidance, make a survivor's entrance into a service setting seem fraught with danger. Unacknowledged or untreated trauma and related symptoms interfere with seeking help for health, mental health, and substance abuse problems; hamper engagement in treatment; and make relapse more likely~Brown, 2000; Janikowski & Glover, 1994;Melchoir, Huba, Brown, & Slaughter, 1999!. Many common procedures and practices in service settings retrigger trauma reactions and are experienced as emotionally unsafe and disempowering for survivors of trauma~Harris & Fallot, 2001! Service systems that do not subscribe to principles of trauma-informed treatment or understand the pervasive long-term impact of trauma may inadvertently create an invalidating environment.…”

mentioning

confidence: 97%