2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentives for carbon sequestration and energy production in low productivity collective forests in Southwest China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, with the current low carbon price, the economic value of carbon sequestration is insignificant, and carbon sequestration cannot alone support establishment of an eco-compensation mechanism, where costs for compensation are many times higher. This is in line with findings from low productivity collective forests in the southwestern PRC where Kahrl et al (2012) reported that higher carbon prices of more than $40 would be needed to provide incentives for more productive forest management. The inclusion of soil carbon in calculations of carbon benefits could also significantly enhance the total carbon value.…”
Section: Integration Of Approachessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, with the current low carbon price, the economic value of carbon sequestration is insignificant, and carbon sequestration cannot alone support establishment of an eco-compensation mechanism, where costs for compensation are many times higher. This is in line with findings from low productivity collective forests in the southwestern PRC where Kahrl et al (2012) reported that higher carbon prices of more than $40 would be needed to provide incentives for more productive forest management. The inclusion of soil carbon in calculations of carbon benefits could also significantly enhance the total carbon value.…”
Section: Integration Of Approachessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is in line with findings from low productivity collective forests in the southwestern PRC where Kahrl et al . () reported that higher carbon prices of more than $40 would be needed to provide incentives for more productive forest management. The inclusion of soil carbon in calculations of carbon benefits could also significantly enhance the total carbon value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As land and forest biomass resources are scarce in China, it is 43 important to ensure that policy is informed on the magnitude of trade-offs and that decisions are 44 based on a reasonable assessment of benefits and costs. A second paper on China by Kahrl et al 45 [9] examined the incentives for carbon sequestration and energy production in low productivity 46 collective forests in Southwest China. The paper developed three scenarios for the management 47 of an existing collective forest plot in a mountainous area, examining economic incentives and 48…”
Section: Lessons From the Re-impact Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%