1972
DOI: 10.2307/1127565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incentive Effects in Children's Creativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results provide good support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the creativity measures and are in general agreement with those reported by others who have studied creativity in young children (e.g. Singer and Whiton, 1971;Ward et al, 1972). For example, the Uses fiuency and Patterns fluency scores correlated quite substantially (r = 0-66, p < 0-001); while Uses originality and Pattern originality correlated moderately (r = 0-29,/> < 0-05).…”
Section: As Shown Insupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results provide good support for the convergent and discriminant validity of the creativity measures and are in general agreement with those reported by others who have studied creativity in young children (e.g. Singer and Whiton, 1971;Ward et al, 1972). For example, the Uses fiuency and Patterns fluency scores correlated quite substantially (r = 0-66, p < 0-001); while Uses originality and Pattern originality correlated moderately (r = 0-29,/> < 0-05).…”
Section: As Shown Insupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Aside~rom the lack of substantial relation between the convergent and divergent creativity measures, this c~nclusion is supported by the high correlations between the two parts o~the Remote Associates (Mednick, 1962;Mendelsohn & Griswold, 1966) while still correlating substantially with IQ (Laughlin, 1967). Thus, the only conclusion that can be made with certainty from the present results 1s that, in these subjects} the convergent measure of creativity depends on processes more complicated than simply the size of the subject's associative Ward, Kogan, and Pankove, 1971). The present results, along with data presented by Ward (1971), suggest that a group testing situation in which time limits are ample and evaluational cues are minimized is adequate for creativity assessment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For example, the mean productivity difference between the Wallach-Kogan (1965) middle-class fifth-graders and the 'iVallach-Wing (1969) college freshmen favored the latter sample, but the discrepancy was considerably larger for verbal than figural items. Also of interest is evidence indicating that the Black disadvantaged fifth-graders studied by Ward, Kogan, and Pankove (1970) were less productive than their middle-class age counterparts on verbal items, but somewhat more productive on Figural items. It is possible that a task such as alternate uses favors the richer experiential repertoires of older and middle-cla.ss subjects, whereas figural tasks have more to do with the organization and accessibility of repertoires.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%