1972
DOI: 10.2307/1127546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creative Ability over a Five-Year Span

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 137.52.76.Creative Ability over a Five-Year Span. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1972, 43, 427-442. Fifth-grade middle-class children whose levels of associati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, evidence is accumulating that divergent thinking (particularly ideational fluency) accounts for at least more than a negligible portion of the variance in activities and accomplishments of talented persons (.beyond the contribution of IQ). Typical of relevant studies are Wallach and Wing (1969) for concurrent validation, and Cropley (1972) and Kogan and Pankove (1972) for long-term predictive validation. Since it is quite clear that divergent-thinking test performance predicts appropriate external criteria only to a modest extent, the evidence for the absence of sex differences in "creativity potential" can obviously not be generalized to the domain of actual creative behavior.…”
Section: Creativity and Sex Differences*mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, evidence is accumulating that divergent thinking (particularly ideational fluency) accounts for at least more than a negligible portion of the variance in activities and accomplishments of talented persons (.beyond the contribution of IQ). Typical of relevant studies are Wallach and Wing (1969) for concurrent validation, and Cropley (1972) and Kogan and Pankove (1972) for long-term predictive validation. Since it is quite clear that divergent-thinking test performance predicts appropriate external criteria only to a modest extent, the evidence for the absence of sex differences in "creativity potential" can obviously not be generalized to the domain of actual creative behavior.…”
Section: Creativity and Sex Differences*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conclusions must be held in abeyance until relevant longitudinal data become available. In a recent longitudinal study, Kogan & Pankove (1972) employed a sample of tenth-grade adolescents who had initially been tested five years previously in the fifth grade. At that earlier time, all of the children had been examined individually.…”
Section: Implications Of Creativity Level In Males and Femalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The British Abi/ity Scales (Elliott et al, 1978) include some very broad age norms for the Verbal Nirency measure, and some workers (e.g., Alpaugh et al, 1976;Jaquish and Ripple, 1981) have investigated changes in creative thinking abilities across the adult life-span. Although some longitudinal studies have been made of the predictive validity of divergent tests (e.g., Torrance, 1969;Cropley, 1972), Kogan and Pankove's (1972) experiment is one of the very few in the literature that has specifically investigated age-related changes in children's performance on these tests (which the authors equate with ' creative ability '). They retested samples of 10-year-old middle-class schoolchildren after a 5-year period in an attempt to establish the longitudinal stability of Wallach and Kogan's (1965) measures of ideational productivity and uniqueness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divergent thinking tests were Uses for Things (Guilford, 1959) and Picture Meanings (Wallach & Kogan, 1965). These tests were chosen because of established reliabiiities (Cropley & Maslany, 1969;Kogan & Pankove, 1972;Wagner, 1972), and because of factorial evidence that these tests are sufficient to obtain a reliable estimate of divergent ability (Hargreaves & Bolton, 1972). The correlation between the two tests was r = .62 in the present study.…”
Section: Divergent and Convergent Abilities Measuresmentioning
confidence: 94%