2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672302005785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inbreeding depression and heterosis in a subdivided population: influence of the mating system

Abstract: We investigate the joint effects of gene flow and selfing on the level of inbreeding depression, heterosis and genetic load in a subdivided population at equilibrium. Low gene flow reduces inbreeding depression and substantially increases heterosis. However, in highly self-fertilizing populations, inbreeding depression is independent of the amount of gene flow. When migration occurs via pollen, consanguinity of the reproductive system could have a negative influence on subpopulation persistence, in contrast to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study we used recently diverged experimental populations to which we applied self-pollination, within-and between-population crosses to investigate the link between the genetic structure of the subdivided population, and fitness-related traits values in the firstgeneration offspring, by assessing within-population heterosis or inbreeding depression, between-population heterosis or genetic load and outbreeding depression. This approach is complementary and intermediate to analytical and simulation studies (Theodorou and Couvet, 2002;Glemin et al, 2003;Jaquiéry et al, 2009) and experimental crosses in natural populations (Fenster and Galloway, 2000;Newman and Tallmon, 2001; because much information on the history of the populations (time since divergence, population census sizes, initial diversity and so on) is available. We found high and significant inbreeding depression within populations for four of six traits with systematic superiority of within-population cross progeny compared with selfed progeny.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we used recently diverged experimental populations to which we applied self-pollination, within-and between-population crosses to investigate the link between the genetic structure of the subdivided population, and fitness-related traits values in the firstgeneration offspring, by assessing within-population heterosis or inbreeding depression, between-population heterosis or genetic load and outbreeding depression. This approach is complementary and intermediate to analytical and simulation studies (Theodorou and Couvet, 2002;Glemin et al, 2003;Jaquiéry et al, 2009) and experimental crosses in natural populations (Fenster and Galloway, 2000;Newman and Tallmon, 2001; because much information on the history of the populations (time since divergence, population census sizes, initial diversity and so on) is available. We found high and significant inbreeding depression within populations for four of six traits with systematic superiority of within-population cross progeny compared with selfed progeny.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these measures will not be influenced by strongly deleterious alleles, which are held at mutation-selection balance in all populations. Although the latter approach provides no information on the degree of dominance, this definition focuses on the increase in fitness within populations caused by hybridization (Whitlock et al 2000;Theodorou and Couvet 2002;Roze and Rousset 2004). In this study, heterosis equals:…”
Section: Heterosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In small populations, a large number of these slightly deleterious mutations may actually become fixed by genetic drift. As the effective size of a population declines, a greater fraction of the segregating genetic load within a population is fixed by drift, being converted into a ''local drift load'' that may significantly reduce fitness (Lande 1994;Lynch et al 1995a;Wang et al 1999;Bataillon and Kirkpatrick 2000;Whitlock et al 2000;Theodorou and Couvet 2002;Glémin 2003;Glé-min et al 2003;Roze and Rousset 2004). It has been proposed that mildly deleterious mutations may even endanger the persistence of extremely small populations if they reduce fitness to the point where reproduction no longer replaces parents, such that a ''mutational meltdown'' occurs (Lynch and Gabriel 1990;Lynch et al 1995a;Saccheri et al 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proposals included using heterosis generated by migration to reinforce populations, i.e., a form of genetic rescue (Richards 2000;Willi and Fischer 2005;Hogg et al 2006;Willi et al 2007), or to understand the success of hybrid invaders (Facon et al 2005). Heterosis may also play a role in the evolution of life-history traits, such as dispersal (Guillaume and Perrin 2006;Roze and Rousset 2009) or outcrossing (Ronfort and Couvet 1995;Theodorou and Couvet 2002).…”
Section: Rosses Between Individuals From Different Pop-mentioning
confidence: 99%