2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01433.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of tomatoes by neutral electrolyzed water

Abstract: Aims:To determine the efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water (NEW) in killing Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes, as well as nonpathogenic E. coli, on the surface of tomatoes, and to evaluate the effect of rinsing with NEW on the organoleptic characteristics of the tomatoes. Methods and Results:The bactericidal activity of NEW, containing 444 or 89 mg l )1 of active chlorine, was evaluated over pure cultures (8AE5 log CFU ml )1 ) of the above-mentioned strains. All of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
65
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Texture evaluation was carried out using: 5 = very firm, 4 = firm, 3 = slightly wilted, but acceptable, 2 = wilted, 1 = very much wilted. Visual appearance was scored as per Deza et al (2003) using: 5 = very good, 4 = good, 3 = normal, 2 = limited quality and 1 = not acceptable. Disease severity was assessed as per the method of Burton et al (1987), as utilised with appropriate modifications for this work: 5 = severely diseased, 4 = diseased, 3 = moderately diseased, 2 = slightly diseased and 1 = no disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Texture evaluation was carried out using: 5 = very firm, 4 = firm, 3 = slightly wilted, but acceptable, 2 = wilted, 1 = very much wilted. Visual appearance was scored as per Deza et al (2003) using: 5 = very good, 4 = good, 3 = normal, 2 = limited quality and 1 = not acceptable. Disease severity was assessed as per the method of Burton et al (1987), as utilised with appropriate modifications for this work: 5 = severely diseased, 4 = diseased, 3 = moderately diseased, 2 = slightly diseased and 1 = no disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aroma was evaluated as per the scale: 5 = no off-odour, 4 = very light off-odour, 3 = light off-odour, 2 = medium off-odour and 1 = strong off-odour. Visual appearance was scored as per Deza et al (2003) using: 5 = very good, 4 = good, 3 = normal, 2 = limited quality and 1 = not acceptable. Another nine point scale; 0 = vegetable completely wet and water accumulation; 1 = vegetable and film moderately wet; 3 = vegetable moderately wet; 5 = vegetable and film slightly wet; 7 = vegetable slightly wet; 9 = no water accumulation was used to represent the water vapour accumulation inside the film packages (Rai et al 2009a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, chlorine has been routinely used for disinfection of vegetables such as lettuce, carrots, and spinach (12,20,21), fruits such as strawberries, apples, cantaloupe, honeydew melons, and tomatoes (22)(23)(24)(25)(26), chicken (27), and fish (28). A recent progress in chlorine disinfection is the generation of chlorine water through electrolysis (29,30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%