This page intentionally left blank
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEForm Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. (From -To)
REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY)
01-10-2006
REPORT TYPE
FINAL
DATES COVERED
SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)
DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution unlimited
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
ABSTRACTUltrasound has potential application in disinfecting a variety of water streams, including shipboard ballast water to avoid transfer of non-indigenous species between geographic locations. Two approaches for improving the performance of ultrasound in disinfecting bacteria were examined: 1) optimizing the ultrasonic intensity by varying the treatment cell diameter, and 2) using ultrasound in conjunction with a second treatment. A contact time for one log kill of an E. coli pure culture of 0.6 minutes was measured when using higher average intensities resulting from reduced treatment cell diameters, a substantial improvement over previous work. Combined treatment consisting of ultrasonic and thermal treatment resulted in a reduction of about 40% in contact time for one log kill of E. coli. Since a contact time of 0.6 minutes per log kill is still likely to be too long for a flow-through treatment system for ballast water, the applicability of ultrasound to ballast water treatment is expected to focus on zooplankton, for which ultrasound is very effective. A second treatment that targets the bacteria could also be employed. Additionally, ultrasound is effective in disinfecting both bacteria and zooplankton in lower flow rates and may have application to other water treatment applications. Additional experimentation is recommended using ultrasound to disinfect natural seawater.
SUBJECT TERMSUltrasound; ballast water; disinfection; Artemia; E. coli; water treatment; terfenol