2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01506.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation of Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia (Chlamydophila) pneumoniae by ozone

Abstract: Aims: To clarify the inhibitory effects of ozone on Chlamydia trachomatis and C. pneumoniae. Methods and Results: Cell culture was performed using HeLa229 cells for C. trachomatis, and Human Line cells for C. pneumoniae. C. trachomatis strain D/UW-3/Cx and C. pneumoniae strain AR-39 were used. Ozone water was generated by an ozone water dispenser and diluted to desired concentration just before each experiment. Preinoculation minimum cidal concentration (MCC) and postinoculation MCC methods were employed. In p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also recovered a new Chlamydiales species (Thomas et al ., 2006b) from river water and a P. acanthamoebae strain from both river water and GAC granules. The presence of this Chlamydia ‐related organism after the ozonation step suggests either that it was present within undetected Acanthamoeba spp., which protected the bacteria from ozone, or that P. acanthamoebae itself can resist to ozone treatment, which would differ from the high susceptibility demonstrated for Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydophila pneumoniae (Yamazaki et al ., 2004). It also cannot be excluded that this new strain has extended host range and is able to grow in FLA other than Acanthamoeba .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We also recovered a new Chlamydiales species (Thomas et al ., 2006b) from river water and a P. acanthamoebae strain from both river water and GAC granules. The presence of this Chlamydia ‐related organism after the ozonation step suggests either that it was present within undetected Acanthamoeba spp., which protected the bacteria from ozone, or that P. acanthamoebae itself can resist to ozone treatment, which would differ from the high susceptibility demonstrated for Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydophila pneumoniae (Yamazaki et al ., 2004). It also cannot be excluded that this new strain has extended host range and is able to grow in FLA other than Acanthamoeba .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As with all obligatory intracellular parasites, C. trachomatis is unlikely to be affected by chlorination and thus survives well in pool water. Ozone only, in a concentration of 4 ppm, was enough to inactivate C. trachomatis and C. pneumonia according to a study conducted mostly for medical purposes [140].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, acidic electrolysed water, neutral electrolysed water and the ozone water have been widely explored for sterilization (Venkitanarayana et al 1999;Nagamatsu et al 2002;Yamazaki et al 2004;Deza et al 2005). The inactivation rate of E. coli with OW of pH 3AE00 is about 0AE07 min )1 , which is obviously lower than that with the electrolysed water (about 1AE4 min )1 ) (Venkitanarayana et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many bactericidal solutions such as electrolysed water and ozone water have been proved to be highly effective in reducing micro-organisms (Venkitanarayana et al 1999;Nagamatsu et al 2002;Yamazaki et al 2004;Deza et al 2005). Generally, micro-organisms do not always appear in suspension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%