2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inactivation and changes in metabolic profile of selected foodborne bacteria by 460 nm LED illumination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some works, blue light (420-470 nm) has been tested as well, showing a strong effect against both Gram-positive (Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes and methicillin-resistant S. aureus) and Gram-negative pathogens (P. aeruginosa, Salmonella Typhimurium and E. coli) in their planktonic form [39][40][41]49,50,54,56,[65][66][67][68]. However, Abana et al claimed that the effect of 455 nm is not completely bactericidal on E. coli but depends on the microorganism (pathogenic or non-pathogenic) and growth phase.…”
Section: Blue Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some works, blue light (420-470 nm) has been tested as well, showing a strong effect against both Gram-positive (Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes and methicillin-resistant S. aureus) and Gram-negative pathogens (P. aeruginosa, Salmonella Typhimurium and E. coli) in their planktonic form [39][40][41]49,50,54,56,[65][66][67][68]. However, Abana et al claimed that the effect of 455 nm is not completely bactericidal on E. coli but depends on the microorganism (pathogenic or non-pathogenic) and growth phase.…”
Section: Blue Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al. () investigated the metabolic changes in Bacillus cereus , Listeria monocytogenes , Staphylococcus aureus , Escherichia coli O157:H7, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and S . Typhimurium following illumination with 460 nm LED light.…”
Section: The Principle Behind Pdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to note that these reviews were written at a time when the idea of using PDI had been floated for the first time. Since then, attempts to use PDI in food have gained popularity, with several papers dedicated to understanding the effect of PDI specifically on foodborne microorganisms, the factors affecting such inactivation, the mechanism of the inactivation and the efficacy of PDI in food matrices (Ghate et al., , , ; Ghate, Kumar, Zhou, & Yuk, 2016b; Josewin, Ghate, Kim, & Yuk, ; Kim & Yuk, ; Kim et al., ; Kim, Bang, & Yuk, ; Kim, Mikš‐Krajnik, Kumar, Ghate, & Yuk, ; Kumar et al., , ; Li, Kim, Bang, & Yuk, ). The current review aims to analyze these works in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the adoption of programs such as Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) are useful to reduce the risks (KUMARI; SARKAR, 2016). Other strategies can be recommended, such as the use of autolysin (GENG et al, 2017), the addition of citric extract (Citrox © ) (TSIRAKI; SAVVAIDIS, 2016) or peptides (HAN et al, 2017), and the use of light emitting diode (LED) (460 nm) (KUMAR et al, 2017).…”
Section: Bacillus Cereus Group: Genetic Aspects Related To Food Safetmentioning
confidence: 99%