2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-wood grinding and screening of forest residues for biomass feedstock applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25% during a time study of a small mechanical screen. The share of delay times during a time study of a grinder/trammel screen system, reported by Dukes et al [23], was even higher, ranging from 34% to 60% of the total scheduled time. Thus, there is still a strong need to carry out long-term studies on machines that can be used to screen woodchips in order to achieve more reliable estimates of delay times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25% during a time study of a small mechanical screen. The share of delay times during a time study of a grinder/trammel screen system, reported by Dukes et al [23], was even higher, ranging from 34% to 60% of the total scheduled time. Thus, there is still a strong need to carry out long-term studies on machines that can be used to screen woodchips in order to achieve more reliable estimates of delay times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, fine particles reduce the air circulation within the woodchip piles, which decreases drying speed and increases the risk of self-combustion and spore formation due to microbial activity and fungal infestation [21]. Previous studies on screening machines already have shown that it is possible to remove fine and/or oversize particles [14,[20][21][22][23]. However, the machines tested within these studies differed in terms of throughput capacity and working principle: trommel screens and vibrating desks are only able to remove fine particles from the material stream, whereas star screens are able to separate woodchips into three fractions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings showed that slash material had a significantly higher ash content compared with the other material types. Dukes et al (2013) analyzed the ash content of two residue types: larger residues from delimbing with a pull-through delimber and branches, and bark removed from a chain flail machine. They found a 4 and 11.9% ash content for the two material types, respectively.…”
Section: Feedstock Quality and Implications For Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of ash in feedstock reduces thermochemical conversion efficiencies in processes, such as gasification and pyrolysis (Lacey et al, 2015). Research on methods to reduce ash content in feedstocks have suggested better material handling techniques to minimize contamination (i.e., soil and sand) and mechanical screening to sort out smaller fractions in "hog fuel" which are typically heavier in contamination (Dukes et al, 2013;Greene et al, 2014). In addition to contamination, bark has been found to be a contributor to ash content (Lehtikangas, 2001;Flibakk et al, 2001;Picchio et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems based on comminution at the landing increase the payload of trucks, since the comminuted material is less bulky, and thereby reduce transport costs (Eriksson et al 2014a;Eriksson et al 2014b). Screening also reduces the amount of fine material contaminants at the source and increases the quality of the produced fuel (Eriksson et al 2013;Dukes et al 2013;Laitila and Nuutinen 2015). Thanks to screening, an ash content of 0.4-2.3% for ground stumps has been reported, while the wood-matter losses have been rather nominal (Laitila and Nuutinen 2015).…”
Section: Procurement Of Stumps and Delimbed Stems For Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%