2015
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In which direction does skin move during joint movement?

Abstract: These findings suggest that the skin moves according to certain physiological rules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Partial knowledge of the relative size and direction of STA in different skin regions (Fukui et al, 2016;Stagni et al, 2005) might also be used to design marker clusters that avoid problematic areas, since not all artefacts have the same impact. This is particularly clear for the GF method, since marker position errors appear explicitly in the AoR error formulas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial knowledge of the relative size and direction of STA in different skin regions (Fukui et al, 2016;Stagni et al, 2005) might also be used to design marker clusters that avoid problematic areas, since not all artefacts have the same impact. This is particularly clear for the GF method, since marker position errors appear explicitly in the AoR error formulas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the muscle fiber length of the PC was measured movement for the skin, but movement of the skin for the bone was not measured. The skin around the joint moved to a greater extent for the bone during joint movement 25 ) , which may have caused a skin effect. Second, muscle activity was not measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the relative movement of the soft tissue and underlying bones, that is, soft tissue artefact (STA) composed of cluster deformation (non‐rigid motion, NRM) and cluster displacement (rigid motion, RM), leads the marker cluster to incorrectly represent the bone pose 7 8 . STAs have been widely investigated in human motion analysis and have exhibited significant effects on the determination of joint kinematics 9–13 . STA‐induced errors in knee kinematics were reported when measuring with different four‐marker clusters, from which it appeared that rigidifying clusters were ineffective for the reduction of STA effects 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%