2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-vivo time-dependent articular cartilage contact behavior of the tibiofemoral joint

Abstract: Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the in-vivo time-dependent contact behavior of tibiofemoral cartilage of human subjects during the first 300 seconds after applying a constant full bodyweight loading and determine whether there are differences in cartilage contact responses between the medial and lateral compartments. Design Six healthy knees were investigated in this study. Each knee joint was subjected to full bodyweight loading and the in-vivo positions of the knee were captured by t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
84
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(47 reference statements)
9
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We define the peak contact strain as the maximum vertical deformation divided by cartilage thickness. It can be seen in Figure 4a that the intact cartilage (Case 1) is predicted to experience approximately 10% peak contact strain when the load is applied for 5 s. This prediction is consistent with the experimental results of Hosseini et al (2010), who reported peak contact strain of 8.6±2.6 % in the lateral tibia plateau 5 s after application of full body weight to one leg. The model predicts a peak contact strain of 13.8%, 300 s after loading application which is also similar to the experimental measurements of Hosseini et al (2010) (i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We define the peak contact strain as the maximum vertical deformation divided by cartilage thickness. It can be seen in Figure 4a that the intact cartilage (Case 1) is predicted to experience approximately 10% peak contact strain when the load is applied for 5 s. This prediction is consistent with the experimental results of Hosseini et al (2010), who reported peak contact strain of 8.6±2.6 % in the lateral tibia plateau 5 s after application of full body weight to one leg. The model predicts a peak contact strain of 13.8%, 300 s after loading application which is also similar to the experimental measurements of Hosseini et al (2010) (i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In reality this is quite difficult to predict, because in vivo loads can vary greatly even within the same joint. During load, the lateral tibial plateau has a greater cartilage contact deformation, but lower cartilage contact area, than the medial compartment during the same loading cycle [37]. Both compartments demonstrated a cartilage contact deformation of between 10% and 15% and the bulk of this deformation was generated during the first 20 seconds of load [37].…”
Section: Combined Compression and Shearmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…During load, the lateral tibial plateau has a greater cartilage contact deformation, but lower cartilage contact area, than the medial compartment during the same loading cycle [37]. Both compartments demonstrated a cartilage contact deformation of between 10% and 15% and the bulk of this deformation was generated during the first 20 seconds of load [37]. The rotation of the femur with respect to the tibia varies during gait with twin peaks of external rotation being observed during early midstance and toe-off [50].…”
Section: Combined Compression and Shearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the absolute peak loads were greater, the impulse loading was not found to be different, indicating that forces on the surgical side upper extremity were applied over a longer period of time. Potential for wear increases with both high peak loads as well as from repetitive submaximal loads [20][21][22] . Debate remains as to which factor: rate, magnitude or frequency of loading is the most detrimental to the joint tissue [23][24][25] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%