2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552011005000007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper extremity joint stresses during walkerassisted ambulation in post-surgical patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is clearly visible in the figure the intensity of the forces are higher on the left pair of legs of the walker (F LEG1 and F LEG3 ), being the force on the rear leg (F LEG1 ) a little bit higher than the force on front leg (F LEG3 ). These results were expected since the compression forces are greater in the opposite side of the affected foot [26]. Fig.…”
Section: A Fsr Testssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As it is clearly visible in the figure the intensity of the forces are higher on the left pair of legs of the walker (F LEG1 and F LEG3 ), being the force on the rear leg (F LEG1 ) a little bit higher than the force on front leg (F LEG3 ). These results were expected since the compression forces are greater in the opposite side of the affected foot [26]. Fig.…”
Section: A Fsr Testssupporting
confidence: 59%
“… Gait phase 2 is a waiting state that ends when the user starts moving the injured foot (making COF x cross LEFT_TH). During gait phase 3 the user transfers part of his weight to the left to compensate the lack of support on the injured foot [ 31 ]. While the injured foot moves forward, the distance returns to the base value (around 30 cm) and COF x returns to the origin, thus making the machine enter in stage 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to be effective, the sensor had to meet certain load requirements. Based on a study done by Mcquade et al [6], the required range of the desired sensor was between 0 to 300 N (30% of the person's body weight) with a +/-10% accuracy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%