In-vivo prospective comparison of bond failure rates of 2 self-etching primer/adhesive systems

Pasquale, Anthony J.; Weinstein, Martin; Borislow, Alan J.; Braitman, Leonard E.

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.008

Cited by 21 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Transbond™ SEP+ (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) was one of the first self-etching primers in orthodontics proven to be a suitable substitute for conventional etching methods in several clinical studies [9,15,36,38]. Yet some authors reported reduced adhesive values [5,14,26,30].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shear bond strengths of seven self-etching primers after thermo-cycling

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shear bond strengths of seven self-etching primers after thermo-cycling

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For this reason, clinical bond failure studies are the only means of obtaining clinically relevant data for evaluating new products. 10 In the literature, several in vivo studies 4,[11][12][13][14][15][16] were published regarding bond failure rates with SEP. However, there are a limited number of studies 2,12,17 on the clinical performance of the combined use of both products-SEP and APC brackets.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the majority of the research evaluating the clinical performance of SEP or the APC bracket system, the observation periods were 6 or 12 months. 4,5,12,13,16,17,24,31 Only two studies 10,34 monitored the clinical performance of SEP over 18 months. The mean observation period of 22 months in the present study was longer than that of the previous clinical studies.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical bond failure rates of adhesive precoated self-ligating brackets using a self-etching primer

Özer

Bayram

Dincyurek³

et al. 2013

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To comparatively assess the failure rate of adhesive precoated (APC) self-ligating metal brackets bonded with two different enamel surface preparation techniques: self-etching primer (SEP) and conventional two-step etch and primer method (CM). Materials and Methods: Fifty-seven patients with complete permanent dentition were included in this study. A total of 1140 APC self-ligating brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were bonded using a split-mouth design. For each patient, SEP (Transbond Plus SEP, 3M Unitek) and CM (37% phosphoric acid) were used in alternate quadrants. All brackets were bonded by the same investigator after pumicing and rinsing of all of the teeth. The number, site, and date of first-time bracket failures were monitored throughout orthodontic treatment (mean, 22 months). The survival rates of the brackets were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests (P , .05). The adhesive remnant index was used to determine the bond failure interface. Results: The bond failure rates were 2.97% and 2.18% for the CM and SEP, respectively. No statistically significant difference in failure rates was found between the groups. The bond failure sites were predominantly at the enamel-adhesive interface in both groups. Conclusion: This long-term in vivo study showed that the combined use of SEP and the APC bracket system can be used effectively for bonding brackets after pumicing the enamel surfaces in clinical orthodontics. (Angle Orthod. 2014;84:155-160.)

show abstract

“…It has been mentioned in the literature that in spite of improvements in orthodontic biomaterials, there is still a need to improve existing bonding procedures [7].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Expressly Fabricated Molar Tube Bases: Enhanced Adhesion

Sharma

Phull²,

Rana

et al. 2014

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A 21-year-old female came with a chief complaint of irregularly placed teeth in the upper and the lower front region. She had no medical and dental history. Her intra oral examination revealed mild crowding in relation to upper and lower anteriors and an increased overbite [Table/ Fig-1,2]. She was decided to be treated by a nonextraction approach with a fixed appliance (M.B.T .022 slot). The bonding of the second molars with the " Express prepared buccal tube bonding technique" was carried out because of inability to band the left second mandibular molar and frequent debonding of buccal tubes. We employed this bonding technique to correct the buccal occlusion and establish " Andrews first key to occlusion that is intra arch alignment.Both the mandibular 2nd molars were bonded using this custom technique for a better bond strength and to provide maximum resistance against being dislodged by the force of a higher dimension stainless steel wire as it is a requisite for levelling.The increased surface area and adherence to anatomic details effect the bonding strength of the buccal tubes and ensure minimal breakage due to torsional stress.

show abstract

In-vivo prospective comparison of bond failure rates of 2 self-etching primer/adhesive systems

Cited by 21 publications

References 9 publications

Shear bond strengths of seven self-etching primers after thermo-cycling

Shear bond strengths of seven self-etching primers after thermo-cycling

Clinical bond failure rates of adhesive precoated self-ligating brackets using a self-etching primer

Expressly Fabricated Molar Tube Bases: Enhanced Adhesion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About