2018
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.23.6.067003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo precision assessment of a near-infrared spectroscopy-based tissue oximeter (OxyPrem v1.3) in neonates considering systemic hemodynamic fluctuations

Abstract: Abstract. The aim was to determine the precision of a noninvasive near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-based tissue oximeter (OxyPrem v1.3). Using a linear mixed-effects model, we quantified the variability for cerebral tissue oxygenation (StO 2 ) measurements in 35 preterm neonates to be 2.64%, a value that meets the oftenarticulated clinicians' demand for a precise tissue oxygenation measurement. We showed that the variability of StO 2 values measured was dominated by spontaneous systemic hemodynamic fluctuatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simply looking at the intra-subject standard deviation of 3.4%, not affected by the mean values, the improvement is considerable, and corresponds to a reduction in the 95% confidence interval for a measurement to ±9%-points, as opposed to ±13%-points for spatial resolved NIRS (8,9). Recently, a new SRS NIRS device has produced lower intra-subject CV for StO2, possibly related to interrogating a larger brain volume and/or an auto-calibration function (40). Reducing the confidence interval has a great impact on the clinical usefulness of a measurement as therapeutic ranges are often narrow and patient management often rely on intervention thresholds, making the reliability of the absolute value decisive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Simply looking at the intra-subject standard deviation of 3.4%, not affected by the mean values, the improvement is considerable, and corresponds to a reduction in the 95% confidence interval for a measurement to ±9%-points, as opposed to ±13%-points for spatial resolved NIRS (8,9). Recently, a new SRS NIRS device has produced lower intra-subject CV for StO2, possibly related to interrogating a larger brain volume and/or an auto-calibration function (40). Reducing the confidence interval has a great impact on the clinical usefulness of a measurement as therapeutic ranges are often narrow and patient management often rely on intervention thresholds, making the reliability of the absolute value decisive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This type of noise had been observed already by a previous analysis of measurements with our NIRS device. 25 In about 20% of the data sets, such a noise component was observed (a sinusoidal signal with a frequency of about 1 Hz and an amplitude modulation with a frequency of about 0.05 Hz). Data sets with this strong interference signal had to be completely removed from the final data sets used for the next signal-processing steps.…”
Section: Measurement With Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy and Pmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Before the fNIRS measurement of the stimulus-evoked HRs, baseline physiological values were measured with fNIRS, as described in a previous validation study of the new NIRS device. 25 The total measurement lasted about 15 min. The measurements were conducted by two or three persons, enabling one person to respond quickly to the behavior of the neonate while the other(s) focused on performing the measurements.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations