2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1120-1797(05)80003-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-vivo portal dosimetry by an ionization chamber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the in vivo dosimetry method here propose depends on, 1. the transit signal reproducibility equal to ±0.8% (2SD); 2. the uncertainty of the determination of the water equivalent thickness, w, of the phantom equal to ±1% (2SD); 3. the p value within 0.8% for 100 MU/min; 4. the uncertainty of the reconstruction factor for static beams C equal ±3% (2SD) as estimated in a previous paper [29].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The accuracy of the in vivo dosimetry method here propose depends on, 1. the transit signal reproducibility equal to ±0.8% (2SD); 2. the uncertainty of the determination of the water equivalent thickness, w, of the phantom equal to ±1% (2SD); 3. the p value within 0.8% for 100 MU/min; 4. the uncertainty of the reconstruction factor for static beams C equal ±3% (2SD) as estimated in a previous paper [29].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In a previous paper [29] measurements in water phantom with the presence of heterogeneous layers built with cork or plastic boneequivalent materials were carried out with the beam central axis orthogonal to the layer planes obtaining an agreement within ±3.0% (2SD) between the dose values measured in phantom and those reconstructed at the isocenter by equation …”
Section: Cine-loop Image Calibration For the In Vivo Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These last values were used to determine the empirical factors f(TPR,d,L) f(TPR,d,L)=normalsnormalt(TPR,w,L)/normalsnormalt(TPR,w,L,d) that took into account the variations of the scattered photon contributions on the EPID due to the different midplane phantom positions as respect to the SAD. In previous papers, ( 7 , 8 ) it was shown that, for distances, d, in the range of ±7cm, the f(TPR,d,L) factors were independent of the thickness, w, within ±0.5%. Hence, we can report the factors in Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…(3) was estimated equal to ±4.5% also in inhomogeneous phantoms where w was obtained in terms of radiological thickness. ( 7 , 8 ) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%