1989
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/34/12/007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo measurements of bone lead-a comparison of two X-ray fluorescence techniques used at three different bone sites

Abstract: In vivo bone lead measurements have been made on a group of about 120 people, most of whom were lead exposed workers. Two different x-ray fluorescence (XRF) techniques were used to make measurements at three bone sites. Finger lead was measured using 57Co sources, and lead measurements were made in both tibia and calcaneus with a technique based on 109Cd sources. The results of the bone lead measurements correlated strongly with each other and with the index of cumulative exposure, thus confirming the value an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(5 reference statements)
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The nonoccupationally exposed female subject showed a larger effect of the calibration lines because her results were considerably less than the mean values for the calibration. Her results also showed an extremely small effect of mutual dependence on coherent peak amplitude because the additional term in Equation 10 depends on the product of Xray peak amplitudes, which were all small in her case. Even for the occupationally exposed male subject, whose lead concentration was substantial (although not extreme), the effect of mutual dependence on coherent peak amplitude was very minor.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The nonoccupationally exposed female subject showed a larger effect of the calibration lines because her results were considerably less than the mean values for the calibration. Her results also showed an extremely small effect of mutual dependence on coherent peak amplitude because the additional term in Equation 10 depends on the product of Xray peak amplitudes, which were all small in her case. Even for the occupationally exposed male subject, whose lead concentration was substantial (although not extreme), the effect of mutual dependence on coherent peak amplitude was very minor.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Comparisons of bone lead concentration at these two sites have been performed for various other occupationally exposed populationslin the past. With tibia lead concentration ireated as the independent variable, slopes have ranged from 1.17 (10) to 2.50 (9), with y-intercepts extending from -14.7 ,ug/g (9) to 48.0 pg/g (8). Although a fair range of results are represented in the literature, the Brunswick relation is certainly consistent in suggesting how much the calcaneus lead concentration will typically exceed that of the tibia in a given exposed worker.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A strong positive correlation has been noted in lead industry workers between bone lead concentrations at various bone sites (9,10). This study will examine bone lead levels for the tibia and calcaneus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Four subjects were stud ied in September 1986 and the remainder in December 1986. The subjects were, in fact , drawn from a larger study population, made up of volunteers for an earlier survey conducted on the same work force, the results of which have been reported elsewhere (16). Therefore the volunteers for this study could be selected so as to represent as wide a variation as possible in terms of the lead levels in tibia, heel, and phalanx.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%