2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.11.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo friction study of human skin: Influence of moisturizers on different anatomical sites

Abstract: In order to understand the human haptic system, the mechanical characterization of skin contact is an important task. As the skin constitutes itself a surface, it is convenient to describe the problem using a contacting surface analysis, especially concerning the friction which occurs when the skin interacts with other surfaces. Several published works have shown that the analysis of the friction response of the skin can provide an indirect way to assess the skin condition.The present study uses a new approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spread of Vaseline through the skin can act as a barrier to lock moisture in the skin The relationship between different substances applied to the skin (lubricating conditions) and fabric friction has not been studied in detail before. Only the moisture content between the human skin and textiles has been the object of several studies [7,23]. Figure 8 shows the effect of different lubricating conditions: Vaseline (Vaseline was scattered and absorbed by the skin prior to testing) and wet skin, on the coefficient of friction for four different body regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spread of Vaseline through the skin can act as a barrier to lock moisture in the skin The relationship between different substances applied to the skin (lubricating conditions) and fabric friction has not been studied in detail before. Only the moisture content between the human skin and textiles has been the object of several studies [7,23]. Figure 8 shows the effect of different lubricating conditions: Vaseline (Vaseline was scattered and absorbed by the skin prior to testing) and wet skin, on the coefficient of friction for four different body regions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively constant in vivo skin-COFs in a similar normal load range (up to 15 N) indicate that both adhesion and deformation (hysteresis) contribute to skinfriction. Deformation was found to be important for skinfriction not only at increasing sliding speeds [24], but also at high contact pressures [22][23][24]51].…”
Section: Friction Experiments: Influence Of Normal Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally acknowledged that skin-friction depends on the type of contacting materials, as well as on the physiological skin condition (e.g. hydration state [15,20,21]) and on mechanical contact parameters, especially on the normal load and the sliding velocity [20,[22][23][24] as a consequence of the viscoelastic material properties of human skin. The role of sebum lipids and their interactions with water have not been fully elucidated yet [16,17,25,26] and were controversially debated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of a number of parameters on finger friction, have been investigated previously, for example, load [1][2][3], surface textures, different materials, contact area, and moisture (for more details see the reviews of finger and skin tribology in references [4] and [5]. "Real" contact area is perhaps the biggest influencing factor on finger friction and this is affected significantly by the parameters mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%