2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-012-0160-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo dosimetry with semiconductors in medium dose rate (MDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer

Abstract: The main reason for the differences between the measured and calculated doses was patient movement. To reduce the risk of large errors in the dose delivered, in vivo dosimetry should be performed in addition to treatment planning system computations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eventually, the high standard deviation for the absorbed dose differences from IVD during the current study can be due to several factors, such as the BT steep dose gradient, inaccurate localization of the control points for TLDs in TPS, and uncertainties related to the intra‐fractional variations in the relative position of applicators to the OARs. Other potential factors contributing to the absorbed dose differences during GYN BT are variation in size, shape, and position of the OARs (e.g., the rectal peristaltic motion) and applicator geometrical shift during the gap time between the CT scanning and their treatment delivery 9,11,27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Eventually, the high standard deviation for the absorbed dose differences from IVD during the current study can be due to several factors, such as the BT steep dose gradient, inaccurate localization of the control points for TLDs in TPS, and uncertainties related to the intra‐fractional variations in the relative position of applicators to the OARs. Other potential factors contributing to the absorbed dose differences during GYN BT are variation in size, shape, and position of the OARs (e.g., the rectal peristaltic motion) and applicator geometrical shift during the gap time between the CT scanning and their treatment delivery 9,11,27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other potential factors contributing to the absorbed dose differences during GYN BT are variation in size, shape, and position of the OARs (e.g., the rectal peristaltic motion) and applicator geometrical shift during the gap time between the CT scanning and their treatment delivery. 9,11,27 There is a lack of online organ motions verification during the treatment delivery in most of the BT departments. Therefore, intra-fractional variations of organs and dosimeters' position to the applicators are essential factors of BT uncertainties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The PTW-Freiburg Model 9112 (PTW 9112) semiconductor diode detector array has been developed for rectal IVD during brachytherapy treatment. This commercially available diode has been extensively used in several studies for real-time rectal dose measurement using Cs-137, Ir-192, and Co-60 sources, demonstrating the detector's dependability for overall treatment checks (Waldhäusl et al, 2005;Tanderup et al, 2006;Allahverdi et al, 2013;Zaman et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%