The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01026-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation analysis of CT-based rectal planning dosimetric parameters with in vivo dosimetry of MOSkin and PTW 9112 detectors in Co-60 source HDR intracavitary cervix brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One study used IVD to measure the actual dose to the rectum during HDR-VBT and compared it to the rectal dose as determined by the treatment planning system (TPS); the mean dose discrepancy was 2.2 Gy [ 32 ]. Other studies compared the actual dose to the rectum with the dose from TPS during HDR brachytherapy for prostate and cervix cancers [ 33 , 34 , 35 ]. In the current study, we used the IVD exclusively for monitoring the doses to the OAR, and modification of the plan occurred accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study used IVD to measure the actual dose to the rectum during HDR-VBT and compared it to the rectal dose as determined by the treatment planning system (TPS); the mean dose discrepancy was 2.2 Gy [ 32 ]. Other studies compared the actual dose to the rectum with the dose from TPS during HDR brachytherapy for prostate and cervix cancers [ 33 , 34 , 35 ]. In the current study, we used the IVD exclusively for monitoring the doses to the OAR, and modification of the plan occurred accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%