2021
DOI: 10.3390/ma14040946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Vivo Degradation Behavior and Osseointegration of 3D Powder-Printed Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Cement Scaffolds

Abstract: Calcium magnesium phosphate cements (CMPCs) are promising bone substitutes and experience great interest in research. Therefore, in-vivo degradation behavior, osseointegration and biocompatibility of three-dimensional (3D) powder-printed CMPC scaffolds were investigated in the present study. The materials Mg225 (Ca0.75Mg2.25(PO4)2) and Mg225d (Mg225 treated with diammonium hydrogen phosphate (DAHP)) were implanted as cylindrical scaffolds (h = 5 mm, Ø = 3.8 mm) in both lateral femoral condyles in rabbits and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
6
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After phase 2, 89 articles were included in this review. Reading these articles, 5 categories of AM techniques described by the ISO/ASTM 52900 85 were identified: material jetting, 38 powder bed fusion, 32,87,91,100,101 vat photopolymerization, 15,20,64–66,70,77 binder jetting, 7,29,40,42,61,63,67,68,73,88,102,103 and material extrusion 8–14,16–19,21–28,30 31,33–37,39,41,43–60,62,69,71,72,74–76,78,79,89,90,92,104–109 (Fig 1). Only one of the selected studies used material jetting for the fabrication of scaffolds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After phase 2, 89 articles were included in this review. Reading these articles, 5 categories of AM techniques described by the ISO/ASTM 52900 85 were identified: material jetting, 38 powder bed fusion, 32,87,91,100,101 vat photopolymerization, 15,20,64–66,70,77 binder jetting, 7,29,40,42,61,63,67,68,73,88,102,103 and material extrusion 8–14,16–19,21–28,30 31,33–37,39,41,43–60,62,69,71,72,74–76,78,79,89,90,92,104–109 (Fig 1). Only one of the selected studies used material jetting for the fabrication of scaffolds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these studies, scaffolds should be easily adaptable to the bone defect, present surface wettability, and induce cell adsorption, proliferation, and differentiation. An interconnected pore architecture, controlled bioabsorption, and mechanical resistance are also expected 15,73,108 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that cements with a 1.67 [Ca + Mg]/P ratio demonstrate high compressive strength up to 22 ± 3 MPa. Kowalewicz et al [129] studied the in vivo degradation, osseointegration, and biocompatibility of three-dimensional (3D) frameworks of CMPC. After 6 weeks of implantation, the Mg225 material based on Ca 0.75 Mg 2.25 (PO 4 ) 2 showed greater osteointegration and volume reduction compared to Mg225d based on Mg225 treated with ammonium hydrogen phosphate (DAHP).…”
Section: Resorbability Of Phosphate-based Biomaterials With Different Ca/mg Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that cements with 1.67 [Ca+Mg]/P ratio demonstrate high compressive strength up to 22 ± 3 MPa. Kowalewicz et al [119] studied in vivo degradation, osseointegration and biocompatibility of three-dimensional (3D) frameworks of calcium magnesium phosphate cements (CMPC). After 6 weeks of implantation, the Mg225 material based on Ca0,75Mg2,25(PO4)2 showed greater osteointegration and volume reduction compared to Mg225d based on Mg225 treated with ammonium hydrogen phosphate (DAHP).…”
Section: Resorbability Of Phosphate-based Biomaterials With Different Ca/mg Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%