Abstract:Local cytokine profiles in skin biopsies from allergic and irritant patch test reactions were determined by in vivo immunohistochemistry to differentiate between these 2 clinically identical afflictions especially at the time of final reading in diagnostic patch testing. Biopsies were taken from established allergic persons after specific allergic patch test.‐, to epoxy resin (1%) and formaldehyde (1%) and from non‐allergic individuals with irritant patch tests to sodium lauryl sulfate (10%) and formaldehyde (… Show more
“…Although the most common observed responses in the skin following exposure to irritants are erythema (redness) and edema (swelling), underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms are now appearing to be useful indicators before overt skin irritation is apparent [8,9]. Molecular responses of the skin to irritating chemicals include inflammatory cytokine release [8,[10][11][12], indications of oxidative stress [13][14][15][16], effects on prostaglandins [17,18], and activation of transcription factors [19].…”
Occupational skin disease is the second most significant cause of occupational disease, after accidents. Irritation from occupational chemicals such as solvents, hydrocarbons, and surfactants are one cause of this disease. Gene expression studies provide useful information about normal processes in the skin and responses of the skin to exogenous chemicals. We exposed rats, cutaneously, to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS, 1% and 10% aqueous solution), m-xylene (pure liquid), and d-limonene (pure liquid) for 1 h and measured transcriptional responses at the end of the exposure and 3 h later for comparison with untreated skin samples. Total skin RNA was isolated and analyzed using the Affymetrix RatTox U34 array. Using the Affymetrix software, we found that 234 of approximately 850 genes were detected as present in at least 80% of the normal skin samples. The largest number of these genes was related to metabolism, oxidative/cellular stress, and signal transduction. Limonene caused the largest change in mRNA levels with a total of 34 increased transcripts and 4 decreased transcripts. Xylene treatment resulted in 6 increased transcripts and 14 decreased transcripts, while 10% SLS caused 5 transcripts to increase and 17 to decrease. Only two transcripts were observed to change in skin following a 1% SLS exposure. Sodium lauryl sulfate transcript changes increased with dose and were maximum at 4 h. Limonene transcript changes were more numerous at 1 h than at 4 h. The observed differences may reflect different mechanisms of irritation.
“…Although the most common observed responses in the skin following exposure to irritants are erythema (redness) and edema (swelling), underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms are now appearing to be useful indicators before overt skin irritation is apparent [8,9]. Molecular responses of the skin to irritating chemicals include inflammatory cytokine release [8,[10][11][12], indications of oxidative stress [13][14][15][16], effects on prostaglandins [17,18], and activation of transcription factors [19].…”
Occupational skin disease is the second most significant cause of occupational disease, after accidents. Irritation from occupational chemicals such as solvents, hydrocarbons, and surfactants are one cause of this disease. Gene expression studies provide useful information about normal processes in the skin and responses of the skin to exogenous chemicals. We exposed rats, cutaneously, to sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS, 1% and 10% aqueous solution), m-xylene (pure liquid), and d-limonene (pure liquid) for 1 h and measured transcriptional responses at the end of the exposure and 3 h later for comparison with untreated skin samples. Total skin RNA was isolated and analyzed using the Affymetrix RatTox U34 array. Using the Affymetrix software, we found that 234 of approximately 850 genes were detected as present in at least 80% of the normal skin samples. The largest number of these genes was related to metabolism, oxidative/cellular stress, and signal transduction. Limonene caused the largest change in mRNA levels with a total of 34 increased transcripts and 4 decreased transcripts. Xylene treatment resulted in 6 increased transcripts and 14 decreased transcripts, while 10% SLS caused 5 transcripts to increase and 17 to decrease. Only two transcripts were observed to change in skin following a 1% SLS exposure. Sodium lauryl sulfate transcript changes increased with dose and were maximum at 4 h. Limonene transcript changes were more numerous at 1 h than at 4 h. The observed differences may reflect different mechanisms of irritation.
“…Previously described as an immunologic inert process, at present there is evidence that the process of irritation involves different cytokines and intercellular interactions [18][19][20][21][22][23] . The cytokine signal response is dependent on the dose and nature of the irritant itself [18,19] . Interleukin-1 ␣ (IL-1 ␣ ) plays a key role in the development of cutaneous irritancy [19,23,24] .…”
Section: Pathogenetic and Molecular Aspects Of Irritationmentioning
Cutaneous irritation presents a major health problem with serious social and occupational impact. The interaction between an irritant and the human skin depends on multiple factors: the intrinsic properties and the nature of the irritant itself, and specific individual- and environment-related variables. The main pathological mechanisms of irritancy include skin barrier disruption, induction of a cytokine cascade and involvement of the oxidative stress network; all of them resulting in a visible or subclinical inflammatory reaction. In vivo, different non-invasive parameters for the evaluation of skin irritation and irritant potential of compounds and their specific formulations have been introduced, such as epidermal barrier function, skin hydration, surface pH, lipid composition, skin colour and skin blood flow. The diverse physiological changes caused by irritating agents require implementation of a multiparametric approach in the evaluation of cutaneous irritancy.
“…Most studies focussed on the cytokine response after a single irritant challenge. [71][72][73][74][75][76][77] Techniques for in vivo cytokine sampling include punch biopsies, [71][72][73][74] suctions blister fluids 76,77 or skin derived lymph. 75,77 The main drawbacks of these techniques are their invasiveness, laboriousness and discomfort for the volunteers.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.