2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00191-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo comparison of bioactive glass particles in rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
103
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
103
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…During surgery, it was observed that the bioglass in the particulate form facilitated its implementation, which agrees with Vogel et al (2001), who made a similar observation and reported it to be particularly useful for the treatment of bone defects. Furthermore, the great capacity of Bioglass cohesion resulted in adequate compaction of the material and consequently in bleeding reduction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During surgery, it was observed that the bioglass in the particulate form facilitated its implementation, which agrees with Vogel et al (2001), who made a similar observation and reported it to be particularly useful for the treatment of bone defects. Furthermore, the great capacity of Bioglass cohesion resulted in adequate compaction of the material and consequently in bleeding reduction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Some authors have suggested that Bioglass has osteoinductive effect, namely, the capacity to induce differentiation of cells into osteoblasts (Oonish et al 1999;Xynus et al, 2001). Later, however, it was proven that it is only osteoconductive, serving as a matrix for migration and proliferation of osteoprogenitor cells (Vogel et al 2001;Carlo et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioglass Ò is a biocompatible and osteoconductive biomaterial. It bonds to bone without an intervening fibrous connective tissue interface and, due to these properties, it has been widely used for filling bone defects [169]. The primary shortcoming of Bioglass Ò is mechanical weakness and low fracture toughness due to an amorphous two-dimensional glass network.…”
Section: Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many silicate bioactive glasses have been studied such as 45S5, 52S and 55S.The 45S5 Bioglass ® with the composition (45 % SiO 2 , 24.5 % Na 2 O, 24.5 % CaO, 6 % P 2 O 5 in weight %) has the highest solubility rate and exhibits excellent bioactivity enabling its application in bone regeneration and tissue engineering [7]. Many elements like Li, K, Mg, Sr, Zn etc., have been incorporated into different silicate glass compositions to improve dissolution, enhance the cellular response, rate of tissue regeneration and amelioration their physical properties [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%