2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vivo biomechanics of the fingerpad skin under local tangential traction

Abstract: Small patches of fingerpad glabrous skin in human subjects were tested in vivo for their biomechanical properties under tangential loading and for large deformations. These conditions included stretching and shearing the skin at a length scale of 0.3 mm using an apparatus comprising a pair of piezoelectric benders arranged to increase the stiffness/free deflection tradeoff when compared to ordinary cantilevered benders. It was then possible to test the skin with up to 80% of tangential strain. With feedback co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
103
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(63 reference statements)
6
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be surmised from these observations that the initial dynamics of the interaction are dominated by the tissue mechanics characterized by the typical nonlinear stiffening of the finger tissues undergoing large deformation [13,18] and that this initial phase of 30 ms is followed by mechanical events precipitated by the neural response that can vary greatly among individuals. For example, one participant recorded a maximum pad deformation of approximately 4 mm on average, but for another participant this deformation was smaller than 1 mm.…”
Section: Finger Pad Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be surmised from these observations that the initial dynamics of the interaction are dominated by the tissue mechanics characterized by the typical nonlinear stiffening of the finger tissues undergoing large deformation [13,18] and that this initial phase of 30 ms is followed by mechanical events precipitated by the neural response that can vary greatly among individuals. For example, one participant recorded a maximum pad deformation of approximately 4 mm on average, but for another participant this deformation was smaller than 1 mm.…”
Section: Finger Pad Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The force/deformation behavior of the fingertips in the lateral, or shearing, direction, is studied in [22]. Actually, the stress/strain behavior of the fingertip under shearing forces is non linear, in fact in [23] the authors experimentally quantified the anisotropic and hysteretic behaviour of the fingertip deformation under the application of tangential forces. In this paper we consider a linear relationship between the resultant wrench and the platform displacement.…”
Section: Device Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finger is a soft, highly deformable object which, besides its complex detailed geometry, exhibits several types of nonlinearities that are manifest at different length scales of interaction with surfaces [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Even under the extremely simplified assumption of linear viscoelasticity and perfectly clean contacts free of foreign bodies and liquids, the contact of deformable bodies with rough surfaces gives rise to theories of considerable complexity that are unlikely to yield simple interaction models [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%