1981
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.40.3.703-719.1981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro transcription of adenovirus

Abstract: A series of recombinants of adenovirus DNA fragments and pBR322 was used to test the transcriptional activity of the nine known adenovirus promoters in a cell-free extract. Specific initiation was seen at all five early promoters as well as at the major late promotor and at the intermediate promoter for polypeptide IX. The system failed to recognize the two other adenovirus promoters, which were prominent in vivo only at intermediate and late stages in infection. Microheterogeneity of 5' termini at several ade… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 and Figure 7), a substantial and readily detectable level of accurate initiation is observed with a template containing only the EIIA promoter (D. H. Huang and R. G. Roeder, unpublished observation). This may be of significance in view of the fact that the major EILA-early promoter does not contain a canonical TATA box and that this promoter is recognized only at a very low level in the other polymerase II transcription systems (20,21). Thus, the nuclear system could be more active in recognizing a broader group of class II promoters with differing requirements for polymerase II factors, although this important point remains to be further investigated.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 and Figure 7), a substantial and readily detectable level of accurate initiation is observed with a template containing only the EIIA promoter (D. H. Huang and R. G. Roeder, unpublished observation). This may be of significance in view of the fact that the major EILA-early promoter does not contain a canonical TATA box and that this promoter is recognized only at a very low level in the other polymerase II transcription systems (20,21). Thus, the nuclear system could be more active in recognizing a broader group of class II promoters with differing requirements for polymerase II factors, although this important point remains to be further investigated.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire et al (8) showed that at least some extracts made from Ad2-infected cells late in infection have different in vitro transcription activities than do extracts from early-infected or mock-infected cells when early versus late transcription units are assayed. Although they found no difference between mock-and early-infected cell extracts, it would be interesting to know whether a difference would be seen between early-infected extracts and extracts from cells which are given CH after the establishment of early infection.…”
Section: Fig 3 Rapid Stimulation By Ch Of Early Ad2 Transcription Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sequences appear to be transcription initiation sites. Subsequently, Fire et al (18) and Mathis et al (19) transcribed E2 RNA using an in vitro transcription system. Analysis of the RNA runoff products indicated that the 5'-termini were heterogeneous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%