1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(94)70046-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro torque-deformation characteristics of orthodontic polycarbonate brackets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
45
0
15

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
45
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…They tend to stain under the infl uence of food and drinks, thereby compromising aesthetics ( Aird and Durning, 1987 ). Moreover, all polycarbonate brackets demonstrate low resistance to torque forces and high deformation values ( Feldner et al , 1994 ). In terms of bond strength, adequate adhesion is diffi cult to achieve with such brackets due to their inert matrix ( Özcan et al , 2004 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They tend to stain under the infl uence of food and drinks, thereby compromising aesthetics ( Aird and Durning, 1987 ). Moreover, all polycarbonate brackets demonstrate low resistance to torque forces and high deformation values ( Feldner et al , 1994 ). In terms of bond strength, adequate adhesion is diffi cult to achieve with such brackets due to their inert matrix ( Özcan et al , 2004 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others speak of an initial torque of 1.0-2.0 Ncm being needed to maintain an adequately broad torque range [2,4,9,21]. In addition to these specified reference values, it should be borne in mind that higher forces can be applied in children and adolescents than in adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a small number of studies have dealt to date with the extent of torque-induced deformation of plastic brackets and with their torque capacity [1,7,9,14]. Feldner et al [9] and Alkire et al [1] each investigated the torque capacity of five different polycarbonate brackets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nikolai 44 recommended a value of 1020 g 3 mm and 3000 to 3500 g 3 mm torque, respectively, on a maxillary canine and four maxillary incisors. Feldner et al 45 identified a lower value of 1000 to 2000 g 3 mm for the upper incisor segment. According to Burstone,46 a force of 1000 g 3 mm was necessary to torque one upper central incisor, whereas a force of 1500 g 3 mm was optimal to torque two upper incisors per side.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%