1998
DOI: 10.1007/s002990050554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro propagation, restriction fragment length polymorphism, and random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses of Angelica plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M, molecular size marker (l v Hd III + ERI 50 ng ml 21 ). Festuca pratensis (Valles et al, 1993), rose (Matsumoto and Fukui, 1996), Norway spruce (Fourre  et al, 1997), Pinus thunbergii (Goto et al, 1998), and Angelica acutiloba (Watanabe et al, 1998), which supports our findings. In contrast, somaclonal variations were reported in Triticum aestivum (Brown et al, 1993), Populus deltoides (Rani et al, 1995), sugar beet (Munthali et al, 1996) and peach (Hashmi et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…M, molecular size marker (l v Hd III + ERI 50 ng ml 21 ). Festuca pratensis (Valles et al, 1993), rose (Matsumoto and Fukui, 1996), Norway spruce (Fourre  et al, 1997), Pinus thunbergii (Goto et al, 1998), and Angelica acutiloba (Watanabe et al, 1998), which supports our findings. In contrast, somaclonal variations were reported in Triticum aestivum (Brown et al, 1993), Populus deltoides (Rani et al, 1995), sugar beet (Munthali et al, 1996) and peach (Hashmi et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This technique has been used for molecular characterization of tissue culture-raised plants such as Saccharum sp. (Chowdhury and Vasil, 1993), Festuca pratensis (Valles et al, 1993), and Angelica acutiloba (Watanabe et al, 1998). However, the technical complexity of performing RFLP analysis, relatively high costs, and the use of radioisotopes in the detection method are some of the disadvantages for its routine application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…insertions, deletions, inversions) (Williams et al 1990). Using the RAPD technique, the presence of genetic variations in micropropagated plants arose from axillary bud explants have been reported (Hashmi et al 1997;Watanabe et al 1998;Bindiya and Kanwar 2003). On the other hand, several reports have been published, where no somaclonal variation could be detected using molecular markers (Rani and Raina 2000).…”
Section: Growth Of Excised Roots and De Novo Shoot Regeneration In LImentioning
confidence: 96%
“…But the genetic fidelity of a culture needs to be determined by molecular markers, such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), random-amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), simple sequence repeat (SSR), which are powerful tools in genetic identification. They have been used for confirming somatic hybrids (Naoki et al 1994), and genetically analyzing micropropagated plantlets (Watanabe et al 1998), genetic homogeneity through somatic organogenesis (Tang 2001), and genomic variations through somatic embryogenesis (Leroy et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%