2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4238(01)00296-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro micrografting and the histology of graft union formation of selected species of prickly pear cactus (Opuntia spp.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
36
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence of the compatibility between rootstock and scion during micrografting is the high percentage of success of grafting, and the establishment of the vascular tissue continuity observed in the histological study [24]. This agrees with the results obtained in our study.…”
Section: Anatomy Of the Graft Union Formationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Evidence of the compatibility between rootstock and scion during micrografting is the high percentage of success of grafting, and the establishment of the vascular tissue continuity observed in the histological study [24]. This agrees with the results obtained in our study.…”
Section: Anatomy Of the Graft Union Formationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Healing is capable of initiating such cellular responses by triggering various intracellular signaling events (León et al 2001;Minibayeva et al 2015;Sophors et al 2016). Grafting generates an impulse to elicit healing mechanism that generates biological response (isolation layer formation, callus differentiation, callus proliferation and connection, cambium differentiation and connection, and conducting tissue differentiation and connection) (Estrada-Luna et al 2002;Fan et al 2015). Studies conducted on graft-healing mechanism focused on determining the quantities of various biochemical substances in the scion (Pina and Errea 2005;Aloni et al 2008;Muneer et al 2016), enzyme activity (Zarrouk et al 2010), and endogenous hormone content (Aloni et al 2008;van Hooijdonk et al 2011;Yin et al 2012), all of which vary with the healing stage; however, signaling pathways of grafting healing was seldom reached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para el establecimiento de un sistema de propagación in vitro en cactáceas se pueden emplear diversos tejidos u órganos como explantes, cuya elección depende del género y la especie. Se pueden usar brotes terminales de plántulas (Gómez et al, 2006), secciones laterales o verticales de cladodios (Estrada et al, 2002); aréolas simples (Pérez y Dávila, 2002;Ramírez et al, 2007;Quiala et al, 2009);semillas (Dávila et al, 2005;De Madeiros et al, 2006) y brotes florales (Wyka et al, 2006), entre otros, los cuales son cultivados con diferentes reguladores de crecimiento (auxinas, citocininas y giberelinas) de acuerdo con los objetivos de estudios y las respuestas morfogénicas deseadas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Terminal shoots of seedlings can be used (Gómez et al, 2006), lateral or vertical sections of cladodes (Estrada et al, 2002); simple areolas (Pérez y Dávila, 2002;Ramírez et al, 2007;Quiala et al, 2009);seeds (Dávila et al, 2005;De Madeiros et al, 2006) and flower buds (Wyka et al, 2006), among others, which are grown with different growth regulators (auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins) in accordance with the study objectives and desired morphogenic responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%