2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro examination of suspicious oral lesions using optical coherence tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the ability of OCT to generate useful noninvasive information to detect epithelial abnormalities would be invaluable as many studies attest. 4,6,[23][24][25] However, at present, the level of discrimination obtained with OCT in skin and oral mucosa remains close to being useful but falls short of something that could be routinely used for this purpose in vitro or in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the ability of OCT to generate useful noninvasive information to detect epithelial abnormalities would be invaluable as many studies attest. 4,6,[23][24][25] However, at present, the level of discrimination obtained with OCT in skin and oral mucosa remains close to being useful but falls short of something that could be routinely used for this purpose in vitro or in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the histopathological analysis of oral lesions, studies found optical tomography to be good at identifying diseased areas; however, it is poor at providing an actual diagnosis or at differentiating between lesions (Jerjes et al, 2010). Recent research found that delivery of gold nanoparticles to oral lesion sites enhanced in vivo optical tomography images of oral dysplasia; however, this was an animal study and further research in this field is therefore needed (Kim et al, 2009).…”
Section: Optical Tomographymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Optical tomography is an imaging technique which uses the principles of ultrasound to examine subsurface reflections on tissue and produce a three-dimensional image to micrometre resolutions (Jerjes et al, 2010). Compared with the histopathological analysis of oral lesions, studies found optical tomography to be good at identifying diseased areas; however, it is poor at providing an actual diagnosis or at differentiating between lesions (Jerjes et al, 2010).…”
Section: Optical Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of 50 patients with suspicious lesions, including oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia, the sensitivity and specificity of OCT were 93-97%, showing the excellent capability of in vivo OCT for the detection and diagnosis of oral PMDs and oral cancer (Wilder-Smith et al 2009). In another ex vivo study, Jerjes et al (2010) confirmed the feasibility of using OCT to identify architectural changes in an abnormal lesion area; unfortunately, it was unable to provide a diagnosis or to differentiate between lesions. Moreover, there are still limitations regarding the application of OCT: (1) a histopathologist is needed to interpret the result, which is subjective, as OCT does not provide quantitative information; (2) only a small area can be examined at a time, because of the small size of the OCT probe (Olivo et al 2011).…”
Section: Optical Coherence Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%