2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro evaluation of skin adhesives during perspiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The funnel‐like holes through the first three layers of the substrate represent human sweat pores in terms of size and pore density [57]. The membrane, as the bottommost layer, is used to provide a uniform flow to mimic human sweating among all the pores [58–60]. Consequently, by applying specific hydrostatic pressure to the substrate, a uniform, controlled and reproducible flow is supplied through the pores, as previously described by Hou et al [58].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The funnel‐like holes through the first three layers of the substrate represent human sweat pores in terms of size and pore density [57]. The membrane, as the bottommost layer, is used to provide a uniform flow to mimic human sweating among all the pores [58–60]. Consequently, by applying specific hydrostatic pressure to the substrate, a uniform, controlled and reproducible flow is supplied through the pores, as previously described by Hou et al [58].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Thormann group recently adapted a similar membrane for skin adhesive testing [ 45 , 46 ] ( Figure 3 b). They obtained similar values of pore diameter and water contact angle as they used the same methodology, also reporting roughness measurements with a mechanical profilometer (obtaining an average roughness, R a , around 10 microns, which is on the same order of magnitude as human skin) and rheology tests.…”
Section: Perspiration Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They obtained similar values of pore diameter and water contact angle as they used the same methodology, also reporting roughness measurements with a mechanical profilometer (obtaining an average roughness, R a , around 10 microns, which is on the same order of magnitude as human skin) and rheology tests. While Eiler et al [ 45 ] used a syringe pump to set the desired sweat rate, Hansen et al [ 46 ] used hydrostatic pumping in combination with a flowmeter. Membrane materials and fabrication steps did not differ greatly from the original work.…”
Section: Perspiration Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations