No abstract

Objective The resistance of sunscreens to the loss of ultraviolet (UV) protection upon perspiration is important for their practical efficacy. However, this topic is largely overlooked in evaluations of sunscreen substantivity due to the relatively few well‐established protocols compared to those for water resistance and mechanical wear. Methods In an attempt to achieve a better fundamental understanding of sunscreen behaviour in response to sweat exposure, we have developed a perspiring skin simulator, containing a substrate surface that mimics sweating human skin. Using this perspiring skin simulator, we evaluated sunscreen performance upon perspiration by in vitro sun protection factor (SPF) measurements, optical microscopy, ultraviolet (UV) reflectance imaging and coherent anti‐Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy. Results and conclusion Results indicated that perspiration reduced sunscreen efficiency through two mechanisms, namely sunscreen wash‐off (impairing the film thickness) and sunscreen redistribution (impairing the film uniformity). Further, we investigated how the sweat rate affected these mechanisms and how sunscreen application dose influenced UV protection upon perspiration. As expected, higher sweat rates led to a large loss of UV protection, while a larger application dose led to larger amounts of sunscreen being washed‐off and redistributed but also provided higher UV protection before and after sweating.

Nanocomposite sheets based on high density polyethylene and containing organically modified fluoromica and three different compatibilizers (ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer and two maleic anhydride grafted high density polyethylene (HDPE-g-MA) grades with different melt flow indices) were prepared by melt mixing processing in an internal mixer. In order to evaluate the direct relationship between different properties of compression molded sheets and their microstructures, mechanical and barrier properties of the final nanocomposites were examined. Fluoromica content, compatibilizer type, and compatibilizer to clay ratio were changed to study the effects of different material variables on the final nanocomposite properties. A second-order polynomial function fitted well on experimental results and showed that the compatibilizer molecular weight played an important role in the morphology and consequently, the nanocomposite properties. Reducing the compatibilizer molecular weight resulted in better delamination and subsequent enhancement in mechanical and barrier properties.Optimization of various properties was done over the 16 designed experiments and 42% improvement in Young's modulus and 30% reduction of permeability, compared to pristine high density polyethylene, were obtained for the optimal sample.

Background Covering the skin by topical films affects the skin hydration and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). In vivo studies to investigate the water vapor permeation through topical films are complicated, expensive, ethically not preferred, and time‐ and labor‐consuming. The objective of this study was to introduce an in vitro and subject‐independent alternative evaluation method to predict the breathability of topical formulations. Methods In this study, we developed an in vitro setup to simulate the TEWL values of human skin and investigated the breathability of five polymeric film formers used in topical formulations. Furthermore, a comparative in vivo TEWL study was performed on ten human volunteers with defined areas of skin covered with films of two selected polymers possessing different barrier properties. Results By employing the in vitro setup, a vinylpyrrolidone/acrylates/lauryl methacrylate copolymer was determined to form the most breathable film, whereas acrylates/octylacrylamide copolymer and shellac films showed the highest barrier properties. The in vivo TEWL study demonstrated the same relative barrier properties for the acrylates/octylacrylamide and polyurethane‐64 films, despite a more complex driving force for water vapor permeation due to moisture accumulation on the covered skin surfaces. Conclusion We obtained a good correlation between the in vitro and in vivo results, demonstrating that our model can categorize different polymeric film formers based on their breathability when applied to human skin. This information can aid in selecting suitable film‐forming polymers for topical formulations with either breathable or occluding functionalities.