2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In vitro clonal propagation of an adult tree of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) by forced axillary branching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
15
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, ½ MS medium was used for establishing primary cultures from nodal segments. Similar to the present observation, low salt concentration was reported to be superior for shoot proliferation in Terminalia arjuna (Pandey et al 2006) and Azadirachta indica (Chaturvedi et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, ½ MS medium was used for establishing primary cultures from nodal segments. Similar to the present observation, low salt concentration was reported to be superior for shoot proliferation in Terminalia arjuna (Pandey et al 2006) and Azadirachta indica (Chaturvedi et al 2004).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4f). Optimum rooting response using IBA has been reported for many trees including T. arjuna (Pandey et al 2006), Azadirachta indica (Chaturvedi et al 2004) and T. chebula well-developed shoot and roots were taken out and washed gently to remove traces of agar and transferred to earthen pots containing garden soil and organic manure in 1:1 ratio. These pots were initially covered by polythene bags to maintain humidity and kept at 26±2°C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be more specific, mid of April was the best time for explant collection for obtaining maximum bud-break which is about 80% with minimum infection, i.e., 20%. Similar results were obtained by Chaturvedi et al (2004) in neem. This period coincides with optimum new growth in field-grown trees, which was known to be more responsive for bud-break as has also been reported by Dhar and Upreti (1999 (Kumar et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Many workers have attempted micropropagation of mature neem trees but failed to show either sustained proliferation in prolonged cultures or transfer of in vitro-raised plants in field (Joshi and Thengane 1996;Islam et al 1997;Quraishi et al 2004). However, there is only one report on micropropagation of adult neem tree, more or less, of same maturity through axillary shoot proliferation by Chaturvedi et al (2004), but they reported the transfer of plants only up to potted soil stage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CH (500 mg L −1 ) supplemented medium did not support shoot growth as a consequence of which shoots remained compact and stunted. In some cases reduced concentrations of CH induced elongation of shoots [44] . CH was unable to induce indirect multiple shoot formation from calli as efficiently as directly from the explants (Graph 4).…”
Section: Casein Hydrolysate (Ch)mentioning
confidence: 99%